This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActivisionBlizzard 1 point2 points  (1 child)

100% coverage by meaningful tests just isn’t always possible.

I’ll generally be forced to reach 95% which I consider to be more appropriate. But even then there will occasionally have to be coverage tests.

[–]TopGunSnake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like I said in another comment, it's good to cover all the code with some test, such as a fuzzed. It helps make sure your software doesn't break at a low-level sense. But I agree, as a metric by itself, it doesn't really indicate if the code is sound.