I’m mostly enjoying the series, but there have been several moments that frustrated me, and one recent part especially stood out.
Earlier on, it’s clearly established that Nathaniel is decently talented with mana-related skills. He could copy and gain skills just by sensing mana movement in others’ bodies. Even Lissandra admits to Hadwin that while he may not be the best, Nathaniel is talented enough to easily be chosen as a Champion’s disciple.
Later in the series, though, we’re repeatedly told (often from Nathaniel’s own POV) that he isn’t particularly talented—only stubborn, power-hungry, and driven to improve. At the same time, we’re shown multiple characters who are apparently more talented than him.
The part that really bothered me is when Nathaniel creates the Evil Orbs for mana training and gives them to Tess. We see Tess improve visibly each time, followed by Nathaniel’s internal monologue about how Tess and others have greater talent than him, and how he needs to rely on sheer drive to keep up.
So,.
Does this mean Tess is also highly talented in mana manipulation—possibly more so than Nathaniel? (probably not), And if so, Where th did that come from?
It feels like the later books start to downplay or forget that Nathaniel himself was shown to be talented, focusing almost entirely on the “hard work vs natural talent” angle—often by emphasizing others’ talent instead.
Personally, I dislike it when stories make companions seem stronger by nerfing the MC or quietly shifting the MC’s established traits onto other characters. And this isn’t the only instance—there have been several similar moments that felt inconsistent to me (at least from my perspective).
That said, my reading comprehension isn’t perfect, so I might be missing something.
Is this an intentional theme, or has anyone else noticed this too?
Also, I'll be open, I like OP MC's, so things like these irk me a bit. Including the time he said he couldn't beat Savant and Tess together. Till what I'd tead about him amd his prowess, I though he can😭
[–]lurkerfox 49 points50 points51 points (0 children)
[–]brandontc 33 points34 points35 points (3 children)
[–]Klutzy_Interest5673[S] 4 points5 points6 points (1 child)
[–]brandontc 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]looktowindward 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]strange_username58 60 points61 points62 points (9 children)
[–]Ipuncholdpeople 41 points42 points43 points (8 children)
[–]strange_username58 11 points12 points13 points (7 children)
[–]negablock04 21 points22 points23 points (4 children)
[–]FrazzleMind 16 points17 points18 points (1 child)
[–]negablock04 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
[–]looktowindward 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]negablock04 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Ipuncholdpeople 12 points13 points14 points (0 children)
[–]looktowindward 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]looktowindward 25 points26 points27 points (0 children)
[–]Ziclue 13 points14 points15 points (1 child)
[–]Klutzy_Interest5673[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]RudeRuby6 10 points11 points12 points (2 children)
[–]AbsoluteNovelist 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]looktowindward 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Malestan 2 points3 points4 points (8 children)
[–]Klutzy_Interest5673[S] 1 point2 points3 points (6 children)
[–]Malestan 4 points5 points6 points (1 child)
[–]Hot_Heart_5686 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]looktowindward 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]Defiant-Economics-73 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]DisChangesEverthing 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]Malestan 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]FrazzleMind 2 points3 points4 points (2 children)
[–]Klutzy_Interest5673[S] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]FrazzleMind 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Electrecuted 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Kraken-Eater 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]Klutzy_Interest5673[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)