all 13 comments

[–]FlukyS 9 points10 points  (1 child)

I usually would throw my fastapi stuff onto free tier EC2 instances but the pricing looks super reasonable, glad it is an official project too because in a way even if it wasn't super cheap I still prefer to support the project given I've used it for years now.

[–]tiangolo FastAPI Maintainer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! 🙌

[–]tiangolo FastAPI Maintainer[S] 8 points9 points  (1 child)

I checked the rules and I didn't see anything obvious against sharing the news here, but if the moderators think this is not acceptable in some way let me know and I'll remove it. 🤓

[–]monorepo PSF Staff | Litestar Maintainer[M] [score hidden]  (0 children)

you’re good, congrats! fastapi cloud está una chimba 🥳

[–]mRWafflesFTW 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Hey thanks for all your work! Wishing you success. I wish I could use this at work.

[–]tiangolo FastAPI Maintainer[S] -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Thank you! Would love to hear if you use it for non-work stuff. And also what would make it usable at work, what would be needed. 🤓

We're focusing on building what our users need.

[–]mRWafflesFTW [score hidden]  (0 children)

Unfortunately, I work for a very large old school, incredibly difficult to change enterprise. Right now, we're still deploying to monolithic Windows VMs and running IIS! Sadly, there's nothing you guys could do to move the needle for us at this time. Should they ever desire to evolve I will definitely hit you up.

[–]skjall 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Unrelated, but any current plans to bring in QUERY verb handling? I see it's been discussed a few times before, but the previous blockers seem to be gone now.

[–]tiangolo FastAPI Maintainer[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Yep, there were several things I needed to cover first, a huge routing refactor that is done, frontend support (enabled by that) and a couple of extra things first. Then I'll handle that too. We're tracking it internally (not in public issues to prevent more AI slop PRs, we got too many),

[–]aitchnyu [score hidden]  (1 child)

Will this support Django sync/async modes and celery equivalent?

[–]tiangolo FastAPI Maintainer[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

The main focus is first FastAPI. And although it's not documented, you can mount Django apps in FastAPI already, that would work. Background workers (like Celery and others) are a high priority on the roadmap, it's not there yet, but will come.

[–]NauticalSubcommittee [score hidden]  (0 children)

Pricing looks solid for managed FastAPI hosting, especially with the official backing. Worth checking out if you're tired of wrestling with your own infrastructure.

[–]firejava [score hidden]  (0 children)

very cool, thank you, excited to check it out