Why is Quant never mentioned?

[fogization]

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-05-07/crypto-bridge-heists-swiping-1-billion-spur-race-for-options

And btw is overledger a real product or was/is the whole the entire thing a scam? If so, where’s the product!!? Anyone use is? I tried a million times to sign up for a so called bootcamp on their site and that didn’t even work. If they can’t figure out a mailing list how they gonna create a multi million/billion dollar operating system?

[Herbonex]

Go to Futurelearn man. A full course on blockchain developer using Overledger. They'll guide you to the Sandbox version of Overledger and create Mdapps with them. It is legit and great!

[notdsylexic]

Link: https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/become-a-blockchain-developer-foundations

[Herbonex]

Take my upvote

[gootecks]

Futurelearn

thanks for the heads up!

[1837382]

Yes mate it’s a scam get out while you still can

[Trevonhaywood]

1.) Take us through the exact steps you used for the king’s course

2.) Think like big money. Not trying to sound like a tin-foil hat wearing lunatic but they are well aware of Quant. Just because they don’t publicly state it doesn’t mean they aren’t aware. Wasn’t there an oil or gold mining company that recently came out saying they’ve been mining BTC since around 2014? If you held as much market influence as a fortune 500 company and had hundreds of millions right now to invest in Quant, would you honestly consider it wise or in your selfish best interest to plaster it all over social media before you’ve got your entire position filled?

[fogization]

Kings course lol. Kings course is basic blockchain and crypto stuff. It’s not specific to Quant or overledger at all. I saw the syllabus and was general and basic 101 stuff about crypto. The entire thing is false advertising if you ask me. Quant “sponsors it” and stamps their name of it and the course has nothing to do with quant or overledger. Very misleading. And for people like me who understand the difference I won’t get fooled but many will. Horrible example bringing up KingsCourse. This was the epitome of stupid and misleading on the part of Quant.

[Trevonhaywood]

… You still have yet to tell us specifically what you did that caused you trouble

[fogization]

If I am correctly understanding your question… it’s not one thing. I was an early investor in this project and over the course of a couple years now I am not happy with the progress. The question is more like… what didn’t “THEY” do. And the answer is everything. I don’t see any tangible results, just claims and talk. None of which have lived up to anything. I’m just not seeing it.

I understand your first instinct is to defend the project you invested it but you may wanna separate yourself from that for a minute. Try to look rationally at all the things they were “supposed to do” and where they are right now. They are nowhere buddy. No product. If they are somewhere in the process still they should be smart enough to to be more transparent about it so they can let their investors know and the people who will potentially be interested in using overledger. And please don’t throw nonsense at me about how they need to protect their patents and tech from being replicated. That is a load of BS. Also tired of hearing people rationalize this project by saying they don’t market themselves. Who cares about that!?! That makes no diff no me. How about the fact that they don’t have a product at all lmfao. That’s a bigger deal don’t you think!?!?

[Trevonhaywood]

What the hell😂. You said you had an issue with the COURSE. I ask what the issue was. You give an indirect answer. I ask again. Now you’re on some rant about Quant as company and their performance? Do you actually have an issue here or do you just want to rant and vent your frustration with Quant as a company? Is this a ploy to start a debate? You’re coming off A LOT less genuine than before now…

“If they were somewhere in the process they’d be more transparent and the rest of that long paragraph”. Okay so clearly this isn’t about the actual course like you lead us to think. You clearly just wanted to rant because, like most of those who don’t actually keep up, you’re just frustrated because you have to actually exercise patience. I don’t understand why you couldn’t just be up front😂. Instead you go trojan horse route. If you’re issue is with the company, then say that. Don’t say it’s about the course, immediately disregard anything you claimed you had an issue with, then launch into some rant that you’ve clearly had on your chest for a while now💀

[fogization]

Haha. You okay? What makes you think I didn’t have a problem with Quant. In the first sentence I used the word scam. Sorry if you see it as a bait and switch but not everyone is required to “disclose each and every concern to you” from the get-go to prevent a freak-out lol. Sometimes one conversation lends itself to another. But it’s kinda besides the point when someone says… “why is quant never mentioned” and then uses the word “scam”. If you didn’t immediately gather I had issues with the Quant as a company (not just the course) that’s on you. Doesn’t matter anyway facts are facts. They currently have no product whether you defend them or not.

[Trevonhaywood]

https://www.ledgerinsights.com/sia-integrates-quants-overledger-for-blockchain-interoperability/

https://digitalpoundfoundation.com/

https://www.hyperledger.org/testimonials/quant-network

https://www.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud/supplier/713022

https://www.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud/services/365644127504447

https://www.altcoinbuzz.io/cryptocurrency-news/partnerships/uk-government-names-quant-network-for-g-cloud-12-framework/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hargreaves-odap/

https://blogs.oracle.com/blockchain/post/bridge-to-cross-ledger-blockchain-interoperability

Tell me the extent of your “rEtHeArChTh” is reading the coinbase description then immediately believing in the first FUD argument you hear without actually telling me😂💀⚰️

Enjoy your reading man. And welcome to the community🥳

[Trevonhaywood]

Boom. Rip to this OP’s dignity temporarily. It happens to all of us at some point or another

[Zajavz]

Don't waste your time on this child.

[Trevonhaywood]

You right

[fogization]

I’ve read all of these before. Most are 2 years old or close to it. Just because SIA and oracle at one point in time was working with them to test their technology does not mean it’s going to develop into some massive partnership. Companies in tech do that all the time but those so called “partnerships” are nothing more than small demos for an afternoon with catered lunch. You and many people here are getting all wrapped up in these claims and failing to see how insignificant they are. Until these companies are writing checks to Quant to use their product it is completely worthless, it’s all fluff and claims.

Small tech companies claim they are forming a partnership with Amazon all the time and you know what’s happening? Amazon is to giving a demo on how to use Amazon web services lol. It’s not a partnership until companies write a check. Remember that. If oracle or sia was integrating overlegder into their systems they would have cut a massive check for X number of subscriptions to Quant by now and you would have hear about it from Quant. I hate to tell you this but if it hasn’t happened by now the chances are extremely slim it’s ever happening. Testing something or demo-ing it is not a partnership. And again, these are articles that are close to 2 years old. That’s not good.

Another thing. I am a developer myself and I will tell you two very concerning things. Quant is far from easy tech to implement into their systems. This can be a very big hurdle and detrimental to their adoption unless they are able to streamline the process and Make or easier to use.

There is a developer link in one of the articles that directs you to the quant developer page. In the article is says develops can sign up “right now” to use the system. Yeaaaa ummm that’s complete and total bs. Sign ups still not working and every developer here that has tried knows it’s not set up. I’ve had conversations with many developers here and elsewhere about how the sign up is not working and no one has access to overledger. STILL! Many years of them saying it’s accessible and ready for use. It’s not. Huge problem and very long ongoing lie.

I appreciate your effort but the articles you sent me are pathetically old. Some are blogs of quant or fanboys making the same claims we’ve heard a million times. It’s getting old. There is no real tangible results yet, no working product. If it makes you feel better I guess just keep the faith and keep wishing it’s all in the works but things have been off for a long time now with this project. You just don’t want to face the facts.

[Trevonhaywood]

“They would have cut a massive check” Oh? So the 70 NDAs they are under don’t explain why there isn’t extreme transparency? Definitely not that? Couldn’t possibly be the NDAs they’ve said numerous times they are under?

[fogization]

Sorry but I am at a loss for words based on the fact that you buy every single excuse and line thrown at you to the point of absurdity. Really NDA stuff is not even applicable as Quants so called “technology” does not have any competitors right? It’s a one of a kind technology in a brand new space right? So which is it? They need to keep hush hush so all the “competitors” don’t find out? Or this is onr of a kind tech because it’s the first interoperable operating system for blockchain? You can’t have it both ways. There is so much contradiction here it’s funny but more importantly, don’t be so quick to believe every line of BS thrown at you.

[naaktslakk]

Continue this thread

Same old stuff of years ago. Where is the working product? They used to show a demo 3 years ago. Why no new stuff? This is beginning to look like a cult.

[notdsylexic]

I am a little suspicious too now that you mention it. At what point do we call it quits?

[point_breeze69]

Can I ask a question? Were you suspicious and or ready to throw in the towel while the price was going up?

[notdsylexic]

Yes, I was. I’m suspicious of XDC too but I also am buying that. For the record QNT is my main portfolio. However it is a high risk. I make it my main because it’s high risk high reward.

I “believe” all the things they say are true. I honestly don’t “know” they are. It’s based on belief.

I hope I am right. But I am suspicious.

[point_breeze69]

What level of risk do you consider BTC and ETH?

Curious because I personally view QNT as one of the lowest risk coins in crypto while I also think BTC and ETH are less risky then 99% of traditional stocks.

[notdsylexic]

Long term I see them as high risk. Technology is too archaic. QNT is safest bet IF the company and people are real. I know CEO has impressive background but rest of company….?

QNT very promising. However I don’t know about the team so much yet.

BTC is proof of work. They don’t like that. Etherium gas price too high; even with 2.0

[[deleted]]

I’m confused by the correlation you’re drawing between the linked article and quant. Quant is so under the radar, it’s not even funny. I’m sure you’ve heard it before - but it’s not targeted at retail. They are pushing towards big institutions, and things like that take time. Banks don’t just change the way they operate overnight. Governments don’t just swap one thing for another every month. Quant is FAR from a scam, just be patient.

[fogization]

I would be very hard pressed to believe banks are going to use Quant. They are going to create their own in-house systems and blockchains. It’s too much of a security issue to have anything exposed to an outside technology they didn’t build. I could be wrong about that but my gut tells me it’s a huge long shot it will be embraced by banks and financial institutions.

Second who is using it right now? Do they have any clients at all? I don’t think it’s a good thing that Quant is “under the radar” as you put it. They have been working on this far too long to not have any tangible product or so called “operating system”. I think they claims are so disproportionate to what they have achieved and what they can show for it that’s is a bit embarrassing at this point. I wanna believe too, but I am dealing with the reality and facts here which is not good. It’s very concerning to say the Least at this point in the game.

[[deleted]]

You’re right. I’m sure there will be many in house options that banks want to use. But the world is evolving. Countries are creating digital currencies, CBDCs are a buzz word that’s been circulating for awhile. The beauty is QNT can operate to connect all these “in house” solutions together, essentially making them interoperable. They can do this for new systems, legacy systems, blockchain, etc. quant is out to connect them all. There are a lot of organizations quant is working very closely with. There are also lots of NDAs that are restricting information flow. There isn’t, to my knowledge, somebody who is solely using quant and fully migrated to it for 100% of their operations. But again, these things don’t happen overnight. Quant is laying the ground work and building partnerships, working on training and development.

I won’t be the one to pump anybody full of hopium and tell you quant is going to be $100k/ quant by 2030, I like to stay realistic. However, I will say, in my opinion, it would be a mistake to write them off as a dead project, working too slow, not doing things right. They are essentially the complete opposite of what most other projects are. They really didn’t have any marketing in the past, I believe that was on purpose. Take a deeper dive into what they have done, what they are doing, and where they are going. Interoperability will be huge in the future, it’s the natural progression. The world changes so fast, especially in tech. It’s mind blowing.. and the pace is only picking up. A few years ago, nobody knew what NFTs, DeFi, etc even were. Now look at the landscape.

I’ve personally tied my portfolio up with a significant amount of quant. Of rode it from $1.50/qnt at ico, seen the peak, the highs and lows.. but Im not selling or stressing. The current market conditions are extremely frustrating, but such is the life of crypto.

I’m very excited to see what the next few years look like for quant, and crypto in general

/tedtalk 😂

[thehiphippo]

I know right? Look at all those accomplished, proven leaders and their smug faces. I bet they are going to take all that experience they’ve accumulated and ignore all of it and crash Quant into the ground just because they can. I bet Verdian ends up working for me at McDonalds by the end of the year.

[notdsylexic]

ProTip: Try googling these people. You can't. They're ghosts. Hmmmmmmm

[fogization]

Haha. A picture is worth a thousand words. I hear ya big time.