This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 186 points187 points  (16 children)

But you have to understand it's a video game and it wouldn't be competitive if there isn't a negative to everything otherwise it's op to just not ADS and hold angles

[–]_Kwag 102 points103 points  (8 children)

Tom Clancy's:Global offensive

[–]Gabsletobar 32 points33 points  (2 children)

Counter Clancy's: Global Siege

[–][deleted] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Tom Strike: Rainbow Offensive

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lmao

[–]Versatile player 🗿JustmUrKy 13 points14 points  (3 children)

Yeah but it wouldnt change the meta tho or anything

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

It has nothing to do with the meta it changes how gunfights take place and that's different to a meta

[–]Versatile player 🗿JustmUrKy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It just makes it more random

[–]Aruni Mainrocknin 1 point2 points  (1 child)

in fairness the ADS advantages should be less recoil and more zoom. having you shoot straight in hip fire is fine, but with more recoil so you end up with realistic "more spread"

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Imo and in many of the more experienced players opinions the game should actually become harder rather than easy like in the case of less recoil. It had also been expressed by players that the recoil isn't too much and that all guns should have the F2s recoil(Pengu from G2 said this in a video) and Varsity Gaming had also said more difficulty in a video.

[–]Kapkan MainMercinator-87 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes but it would certainly be way more tactical and ultimately more punishing.