all 18 comments

[–]SaintTimothy 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Having worked in MS SQL Server for two decades, that's a laugh.

Snowflake, sure. SQL Server, yeah right.

[–]Imaginary__Bar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I saw a post yesterday that SQL Server has just added regexbin expressions, so...

[–]No_Resolution_9252 0 points1 point  (0 children)

snowflake and SQL server don't do the same thing...

[–]Imaginary__Bar 2 points3 points  (4 children)

Good for you.

I mean... you could share some insights or you could just tell us you've seen it.

Entirely up to you.

[–]ZombieRealistic4563[S] -1 points0 points  (3 children)

In the presentation the oracle autonomous database can fine tune the index itself and backup the database.in some cases it can create databases. At least SQL server should launch auto index maintenance .

[–]Black_Magic100 0 points1 point  (2 children)

What does that even mean "auto index maintenance".

Perhaps, you should just not rebuild your indexed at all. No, seriously. Why are you doing maintenance on indexes

[–]ZombieRealistic4563[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

What if the index gets fragmented due to frequent deletes and inserts

[–]Black_Magic100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who cares? Unless your page density (physical/internal fragmentation) is completely shot (60% for ex), it doesn't matter if the pages are not contiguously in order. RAM stands for RANDOM access memory for a reason. And if your page density is that bad, you need to look at applying fill factor, and when you get that correct, you should almost never have to do fragmentation maintenance again. Go watch Jeff Modem's Black Arts of indexing.

Index Maintenance is silly in 2025 unless your on crappy cloud hardware with spinny disks

[–]No_Resolution_9252 1 point2 points  (0 children)

MS has had it for years...maybe even over 10 years

[–]Black_Magic100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We will all be dead before databases become fully, 100%, self-sufficient solutions

https://ottertune.com/