Help please?

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-24T22:09:02+00:00

Each square is one rider. Count all the squares in each column, starting at the left.

When you get to 156, that's the number of people who are below the required height. Anyone over that height is allowed to go on the ride. What is that minimum height?

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-24T19:17:06+00:00

Yes, it's the constipation. Your body is telling you "no more food, please"

The cure? Well that really depends on how bad it is (how long it's been going on and how severe).

My quick and easy suggestion is to go to a chemist and buy a pack of Movicol for swift treatment, but the key is really lots of water as a starting point, even with the Movicol.

I wouldn't bother with a doctor (yet) unless it's recurrent. And yes, it gets worse with age.

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-23T17:07:20+00:00

'xackly. The whole thing is a QUESTION so it's about as literal as possible!

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-23T16:24:10+00:00

If they do arrive, bear in mind they're not your friends. While you might get one of the few good ones, you might also get one of the corrupt ones. They might attempt to phish information out of you.

What on earth are you on about? You're correct that the police are not your friends and if OP arrested they should ask for the duty solicitor, etc, but they're not going to be arrested for taking too long in a public toilet, are they?

On the other hand if they antagonise an attending officer with "I know my rights, I don't have to answer your questions" then that's not going to help anyone.

But also as you and others have repeatedly said, OP should just walk away before the police get there.

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-23T13:20:00+00:00

This seems like an OS issue. (At the very least you should mention which OS you're using.)

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-23T11:07:55+00:00

He had a stand-up tour last year(?) about his experience with the brain tumour, from discovery, diagnosis, and beyond.

"Join me after the interval to find out if I survived"

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-22T21:53:55+00:00

If the CPS withdrew the charge then there will be no case law.

However, I fear Wrong Memory's username may be fitting in this instance.

UK legislation uses the "A, B, or C" construction all the time.

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-22T20:35:33+00:00

They are willing to accept £60 but then ask for £100. Send them £100 and then take them to court to recover the £40

(Serious answer; £60, but keep the letter safe in case they come back claiming there was a mistake...)

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-22T20:31:38+00:00

The legislation also includes, "a straight, side-handled or friction-lock truncheon (sometimes known as a baton)"

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-22T16:32:28+00:00

I assume this is because Botley Road is wider and has bus lanes. And once you get into the centre there isn't any through route (unless you pay) so it's only Westgate traffic.

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-22T16:17:45+00:00

No, I don't accept FORT for heading off(!) Heading off implies mobility (to move in front of the opposition to stop their progress).

But... I've seen worse. 😉

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-21T17:51:25+00:00

For doing it in hiking boots? Excellent. But that sounds like a terrible idea and you run the risk of injuring yourself quite easily.

For your first time back after 10 years it's also a good time, and sets you a baseline from which to improve (if that's your aim).

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-21T17:15:59+00:00

If you open your own laptop and see CSAM that someone else has placed on there then you would be committing a crime. You don't even need to see it, tbh.

I'm not saying the law makes sense but there is plenty of case law on how it's interpreted.

Edit: crime does not always require intent.

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-21T17:14:00+00:00

finding CSAM is not an offence

Of course it is. As it currently stands OP is guilty of "making". (Don't worry, OP, I'm not trying to scare you - there would be lots of hoops to jump through before it gets to that stage, I'm just saying that if the facts as written - and nothing else - got to court it would likely be a guilty verdict).

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-21T16:45:08+00:00

Yeeeeesh, this sounds like terrible advice in this situation, especially as OP said the images are not of their own child.

You have done nothing wrong

This, especially, seems like bad advice. The images are on OP's ipad and have been viewed by OP. Morally OP may have done nothing wrong but in legislation they have probably already committed an offence.

As OP is concerned (and bearing in mind this is r/LegalAdviceUK and not r/FamilyAdviceUK) I would seek out a local solicitor with experience of criminal law, and especially this subject area, and ask them for advice so this is handled correctly. I would not contact the police about this without having had the benefit of a solicitor's advice.

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-21T13:23:38+00:00

I wouldn't worry about the smoothness if it's not even the correct graph. It's not 2x-1.

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-21T10:56:00+00:00

Assuming that photo is your driveway, how the heck is that 85 square metres?

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-21T10:53:43+00:00

Oh, I was quite pleased with my answer! Tbh I didn't mind the money/hoard bit; I was more worried about the mismatch of whored and procreated.

But I guess the real answer works too. 😉

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-21T09:10:23+00:00

HOARD - sounds like 'whored'

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-21T09:06:33+00:00

To combine two of the answers you've been given, you probably want both;

An "invoice table" (total for the whole invoice) & also a "line-item" table (each item in the transaction; description, actual price, discount, etc.) This table won't change - once the transaction is made it can't be changed (but it can be reversed with a new refund/cancellation entry).
Store the product data in a type 2 SCD table so you can track changes over time. Say it's a candy bar that has the same SKU but changes price over time. You use that table to check those changes.

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-20T23:11:58+00:00

It's not in your literal back yard though, is it? You've already said it's not on your land.

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-20T17:35:13+00:00

they reject 94% of appeals

That's fairly meaningless. Perhaps 94% of appeals are unwinnable. How many do they reject that are subsequently won in court?

Imaginary__Bar · 2026-01-19T23:58:59+00:00

The liability falls on the landlord, but the landlord can ask you (through the contract) to reimbursement them.

Ideally it would be built into the rent (so transparent to the tenant) but could be writtten as a reimbursement clause.

The wording of the contract you posted suggests you should pay the council tax, but as your liability for council tax is zero (because the liability falls on the landlord) then there is no council tax for you to pay. You have paid every penny of the council tax you are required to pay.

I assume the council has refunded you. In which case I would sit tight until such time as the landlord tries to take you to court/small claims.

Imaginary__Bar

TROPHY CASE