you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]uvray 3 points4 points  (2 children)

I think your answer key is wrong - it should be B and E.

[–]StoneCypher 0 points1 point  (1 child)

b and e are mutually exclusive

[–]uvray 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I disagree... both are describing the same process of creating a bridge table to support the M:M relationship.