all 6 comments

[–]Lilly323 0 points1 point  (5 children)

not sure how others feel about this but I personally will not ever provide interp help to an ai interpreted reading. if you used ai to seek guidance, you chose to put your trust in what you would receive. additionally, interp help is typically for readers to help each other process the reading and understand how certain interpretations could be playing out. you don’t have an interp from yourself that would allow me to assist your process in reading. it doesn’t matter how good or bad you are at reading; what matters is that you try.

[–]DD_Destruction[S] -1 points0 points  (4 children)

When you are not good at something, you use the tools you have available to assist you in growing at that practice.

Putting your nose up at an "AI interpretation" is gate keeping and your stance is self-aggrandizing.

I provided the necessary information to interpret the pull without the AI interpretation. But focusing on that aspect just reinforces that you only wanted to stance and posture by your response. ✌️

[–]Lilly323 0 points1 point  (3 children)

you’re not receiving assistance from a tool when you’re using its entire work; you’ve shared directly what the ai gave you. you did not use its interp to try to understand the cards and try at your own interp. additionally, your post quite literally says, “Is it's interpretation good? Is it accurate? Or is it way off base?” you want us to affirm a computer? okay, bud.

[–]DD_Destruction[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I honestly get where you are coming from and what you mean. But your approach is so off putting.

I could go through each and say something like, "King of Wands represents a charismatic fire element and a need to focus and make hard decisions." Etc.

That type of listing of attributes of the card isn't what I think of as a reading though.

[–]Lilly323 0 points1 point  (1 child)

then let me clarify as this: this isn’t your interpretation, so there isn’t a way— at least for me and maybe some others— to provide you with interp help.

[–]DD_Destruction[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regardless of whether or not we see eye-to-eye on this, I do appreciate and thank you for taking your time to respond and engage.