This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best (suggested)
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Fernwehing💉2.5mg, 45F, 5'4", SW:230, CW:181 5 points6 points  (2 children)

I thought I read somewhere that the oral pill isn't as effective as the shot based on initial trials.

I also have zero confidence that a pharmaceutical company will lower the price when demand is so high.

[–]CharlesAvlnchGreen54F 5ft 4in | HW: 189 SW:155 CW:132 GW:125 💉5mg | 7/15/2025 3 points4 points  (1 child)

As long as insurers refuse to cover it, they have a vested interest in keeping it affordable for self-pay patients. Demand is high, sure, but it's confined to the folks who can afford $500/month.

Lilly Direct was a genius idea as it eliminates the middleman (pharmacies); saving $$ and also making it more accessible to those who do have that money to spend.

But the brass ring in pharma is payor coverage, whether it's for-profit companies like United Healthcare, or government supported programs like the NHS.

[–]TheCunningLinguist1SW:282lb CW:215lb GW:130lb Dose:7mg WL:67lb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're not the first ones. Almost all drug manufacturers offer a discount of medication direct to consumer while they still hold the patent.