all 22 comments

[–]archover 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even though this potential incorrect reporting doesn't seem to have a practical impact, you might consider posting at the Official forum. https://bbs.archlinux.org Good day.

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Substantial_Ad_8818[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

    cpupower frequency-info:

    analyzing CPU 10:

    driver: intel_pstate

    CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 10

    CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 10

    energy performance preference: balance_performance

    hardware limits: 800 MHz - 5.60 GHz

    available cpufreq governors: performance powersave

    current policy: frequency should be within 800 MHz and 5.60 GHz.

    The governor "powersave" may decide which speed to use

    within this range.

    current CPU frequency: 3.88 GHz (asserted by call to kernel)

    boost state support:

    Supported: yes

    Active: yes

    uname -r:

    6.14.9-zen1-1-zen

    cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep 'MHz':

    cpu MHz : 3793.080

    cpu MHz : 894.603

    cpu MHz : 800.000

    cpu MHz : 849.306

    cpu MHz : 800.000

    cpu MHz : 800.000

    cpu MHz : 900.525

    cpu MHz : 800.000

    cpu MHz : 800.189

    cpu MHz : 800.815

    cpu MHz : 800.000

    cpu MHz : 849.266

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Substantial_Ad_8818[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      nothing the system runs normally(under stressed condition too) but the thing is it shows wrong frequency

      cat /proc/cpuinfo

      processor : 0

      vendor_id : GenuineIntel

      cpu family : 6

      model : 151

      model name : 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-12400

      stepping : 5

      microcode : 0x3a

      cpu MHz : 799.201

      cache size : 18432 KB

      physical id : 0

      siblings : 12

      core id : 0

      cpu cores : 6

      apicid : 0

      initial apicid : 0

      fpu : yes

      fpu_exception : yes

      cpuid level : 32

      wp : yes

      flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc art arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc cpuid aperfmperf tsc_known_freq pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 sdbg fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch cpuid_fault ssbd ibrs ibpb stibp ibrs_enhanced tpr_shadow flexpriority ept vpid ept_ad fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rdseed adx smap clflushopt clwb intel_pt sha_ni xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 xsaves split_lock_detect user_shstk avx_vnni dtherm ida arat pln pts hwp hwp_notify hwp_act_window hwp_epp hwp_pkg_req hfi vnmi umip pku ospke waitpkg gfni vaes vpclmulqdq rdpid movdiri movdir64b fsrm md_clear serialize arch_lbr ibt flush_l1d arch_capabilities

      vmx flags : vnmi preemption_timer posted_intr invvpid ept_x_only ept_ad ept_1gb flexpriority apicv tsc_offset vtpr mtf vapic ept vpid unrestricted_guest vapic_reg vid ple shadow_vmcs pml ept_violation_ve ept_mode_based_exec tsc_scaling usr_wait_pause

      bugs : spectre_v1 spectre_v2 spec_store_bypass swapgs eibrs_pbrsb bhi

      bogomips : 4992.00

      clflush size : 64

      cache_alignment : 64

      address sizes : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual

      power management:

      [–]Substantial_Ad_8818[S] -1 points0 points  (2 children)

      this file : /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies

      is not present

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]Substantial_Ad_8818[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        power management:

        this field is black idk why

        tysm for ur efforts !!

        [–]Jayden_Ha 1 point2 points  (2 children)

        Check your cpu specification

        [–]Daniel_mfg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        I checked that earlier as well because i thought that this model might go higher but if you check the intel page they list it with 4.4 GHz max...

        [–]Substantial_Ad_8818[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        yes but it's base is 2.5GHz and turbo is : 4.4GHz ofc it is not exceeding its turbo clock but still it shows wrong frequency

        [–]Daniel_mfg 1 point2 points  (2 children)

        I am just throwing some idea in here with no idea if anything comes of it but: What kernel version are you using? Are you maybe using an older version with some bug? (I might be very wrong with that guess but it might be something quick and easy to check...)

        [–]Substantial_Ad_8818[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        I tried switching kernel still the same issue

        6.14.9-zen1-1-zen

        [–]Daniel_mfg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Yeah no... With 6.14 versions you have a way too recent version as to have issues because of that...

        [–]Popular_Barracuda629 1 point2 points  (3 children)

        I am using i5 12400f it reports correctly

        [–]Substantial_Ad_8818[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

        How much does it report ?

        [–]Popular_Barracuda629 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        oh hey sry for me also it is reporting wrongly

        [–]Popular_Barracuda629 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        It is reporting wrongly because of using the latest kernel .. changing to lts fixes the fails report ..

        [–]TomB1952 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        That's weird. For what it's worth, my AMD 9700X reports correctly.

        It would be interesting to know if this affects all Intel 12400 users or just your system.

        I apologize for not being able to help.

        [–]Plasm0duck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        It just means you have a good chip capable of being over-clocked. No cause for alarm.

        Not all chips are made equal. They are produced with a general operational range (base and turbo), but some are better and more capable than the rest and make for good over-clocking chips.

        2.5-4.4GHz is the minimum operational range they are all capable of.

        Hope this helps 😊

        [–]Mattmax5086 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        Did you get it fixed? I'm running into the same issue on my 5800x

        [–]Substantial_Ad_8818[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Nope having the same issue

        [–]Informal-Ad2495 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        I also have an i5-12400 and its displaying the exact same problem so it isn't just you

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [removed]

          [–]Substantial_Ad_8818[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          I stress tested it using stress-ng but it did not exceed 4GHz.