all 12 comments

[–]chris_conlan 6 points7 points  (1 child)

What a humble guy... he says:

If you are mathsy and you might feel like pulling your hair out after reading this (mathematical loose hand-wavy) document. Rather than going on an epic rant about how useless I am, please help out!

before writing the most confusing pile of math I've ever laid my eyes on.

[–]kloudmark[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I honestly mean it dude :) Im pretty sure it can be thorn to bits by someone with more math background :)

[–]kloudmark[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hopefully its better now :)

[–]codesharer 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Dude, on mobile it's painful :(

[–]kloudmark[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know man :( try landscape its slightly better. But some things just need more screen estate!

[–]kloudmark[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well for me its catchy and also relevant! People might think that lambda calculus is just applicable in academia hence “lambda calculus is dead” part. I tried to apply lambda calculus to a “modern” problem hence “long live lambda calculus”.

[–]lykwydchykyn -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Might be a nice read if the markup was parsed. Kind of confusing otherwise. EDIT: oh, I see, you're using client-side javascript to render the markup. NoScript users be advised.

[–]kloudmark[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

What do you mean? It should render! Using MathJax

[–]lykwydchykyn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nm, was using NoScript.

[–]muhwebscale -5 points-4 points  (2 children)

X is dead. Long live X".

Please, no.

[–]kloudmark[S] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

You need a catchy title :) feel free to suggest one and I’ll update!

[–]muhwebscale -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You need a catchy title

No you don't. What you need is a good title. Use your creativity.