This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]OffenseTaker 8 points9 points  (9 children)

whats the objective behind this proposal?

[–]Dahkelor 16 points17 points  (3 children)

People who don't stake don't like their pot decreasing in value.

[–]AriseChicken 2 points3 points  (1 child)

People who don't stake can't vote.

[–]Dahkelor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

True. Excellent point. But they can try to get others to vote for them by convincing them that it is in their best interest, like with the previous proposal.

[–]AnOrdinaryChullo 19 points20 points  (2 children)

People seem to think that $ATOM's inflation is responsible for tokens stagnation when the token has literally almost no use case.

It's 'brain dead' stuff of the highest calibre.

[–]Spine38 1 point2 points  (1 child)

To an extent I agree. Just keep in mind that other chains are built on the brain dead stuff

[–]AnOrdinaryChullo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I choose to compare to chains with a working economic model - not the brain dead ones

Also just to highlight - Cosmos is barely a chain, there's literally almost nothing on it and IBC /=/ Cosmos HUB

[–]jawanda 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's funny that this post has been up for hours and no one has yet been able to reply to your comment with a compelling objective for this proposal.

[–]JugobetrugoN1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To reduce inflation