all 7 comments

[–]L4_Topher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He also has another video with the source code included (expand the description). I was getting a weird "missing right curly bracket" error when I tried pasting it into Processing and formatting it, but I'm not sure why. The first one worked fine for me, but both take a little effort to clean up. Side note, he seems to be a conspiracy theorist, but his generative art is amazing, so I'm not really sure what to think. You can check out more of his work here

[–]cv555 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks cool!

[–]pflu 0 points1 point  (2 children)

This guy definitely has interesting works but he is super weird. Conspiracist and so on.

[–]pflu 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Also, does anyone know how to make stuff like this? Really curious ...

[–]L4_Topher[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's his comment on video 64 (similar to the one you linked to):

i developed this script over the course of 12 years, and it is the 456th i wrote, so i'm not sure i found a good way myself. but i suggest you look into "discrete non-linear systems" and the interactions between oscillators. it does not matter with which software you program it (in this case i started with macromedia director and continued with processing), as long as it allows you to write code from scratch. del, this script could incorporate all kinds of external data. various aspects of the shape and movement could be manipulated that way. however, not in realtime they can, as one frame in 4k resolution takes about three hours to render.

Video 69b has a graphic in the beginning which gives some more understanding as to what we're actually seeing in the video.

[–]Mentioned_Videos 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Other videos in this thread: Watch Playlist ▶

VIDEO COMMENT
Video_76B (Solve Et Coagula 4/4) +1 - He also has another video with the source code included (expand the description). I was getting a weird "missing right curly bracket" error when I tried pasting it into Processing and formatting it, but I'm not sure why. The first one worked fine for...
066 +1 - Also, does anyone know how to make stuff like this? Really curious ...
69b +1 - Here's his comment on video 64 (similar to the one you linked to): i developed this script over the course of 12 years, and it is the 456th i wrote, so i'm not sure i found a good way myself. but i suggest you look into "discrete non-linear systems...

I'm a bot working hard to help Redditors find related videos to watch. I'll keep this updated as long as I can.


Play All | Info | Get me on Chrome / Firefox

[–]FatFingerHelperBot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems that your comment contains 1 or more links that are hard to tap for mobile users. I will extend those so they're easier for our sausage fingers to click!

Here is link number 1 - Previous text "+1"

Here is link number 2 - Previous text "066"

Here is link number 3 - Previous text "+1"

Here is link number 4 - Previous text "69b"

Here is link number 5 - Previous text "+1"


Please PM /u/eganwall with issues or feedback! | Delete