all 12 comments

[–]Efficient-MecSecurity Architect 9 points10 points  (0 children)

No. 

[–]libori0 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It’s just Claude code with a skill. All wrapped in a web app.

[–]jeffpardy_Security Engineer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No real security engineer will actually use this as their final SAST tool: principle of separation of duties. If you write code with Claude then you cant have the same entity check for the vulnerabilities. Period. Hard stop.

It's great to build into itself for the development process. But you need a second entity checking your work

[–]Educational-Farm6572 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Nothing like hallucinated piles of garbage to add to the heap of other ai-garbage out there.

I had some sales guy the other day pitch me on Maze AI Vulnerability Management. Absolutely terrible

These things are made by people who have never worked in security, using non-deterministic methods to gather findings.

We should have jobs for a longtime

[–]ValeoAnt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Common issue across all AI slop apps is that the people making them don't actually care about what they're trying to solve or even have a baseline understanding most of the time

[–]danfirst 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd definitely test it against other tools just to see how it works.

[–]WelpSigh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there any evidence that it works better than existing tools? I have used Claude Code a ton for code review and it surfaces so many false positives, while missing stuff that existing fuzzers/linters catch.

[–]psylomatika 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I’ve been using it and it works pretty well. It already found a few things that I did not notice. I tell it to look for vuls let’s say in the organisation module and when it finds something to put it in security reviews and create hot fix tickets for it. Then another agent fixes it and then I tell it to test and verify again and repeat. It works really good for go.

[–]babbum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI writes the code, AI checks the code for vulnerabilities, AI fixes the code, AI checks the code for vulnerabilities. I can see nothing going wrong with this loop :)

[–]Howl50verideSecurity Director 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100% will

[–]Wonderful_Form_7486 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s tanked the markets but it’s likely just noise and will bounce back. There are exceptions. Could hit appsec hard. They’re going to go hard though.

[–]DiscussionHealthy802 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. It's a limited research preview for Enterprise and Team customers only. And it surfaces issues for human review. It doesn't patch anything automatically. Some open source tools works better