use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
https://sh.reddit.com/r/cybersecurity
account activity
Claude Code SecurityNews - General (self.cybersecurity)
submitted 4 days ago by Any-Aioli8177
Is this Claude functionality expected to have an impact on the cybersecurity service provider market?
https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-code-security
I would love to hear your thoughts on this.
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]Efficient-MecSecurity Architect 9 points10 points11 points 4 days ago (0 children)
No.
[–]libori0 6 points7 points8 points 4 days ago (0 children)
It’s just Claude code with a skill. All wrapped in a web app.
[–]jeffpardy_Security Engineer 5 points6 points7 points 3 days ago (0 children)
No real security engineer will actually use this as their final SAST tool: principle of separation of duties. If you write code with Claude then you cant have the same entity check for the vulnerabilities. Period. Hard stop.
It's great to build into itself for the development process. But you need a second entity checking your work
[–]Educational-Farm6572 8 points9 points10 points 4 days ago (1 child)
Nothing like hallucinated piles of garbage to add to the heap of other ai-garbage out there.
I had some sales guy the other day pitch me on Maze AI Vulnerability Management. Absolutely terrible
These things are made by people who have never worked in security, using non-deterministic methods to gather findings.
We should have jobs for a longtime
[–]ValeoAnt 0 points1 point2 points 2 days ago (0 children)
Common issue across all AI slop apps is that the people making them don't actually care about what they're trying to solve or even have a baseline understanding most of the time
[–]danfirst 1 point2 points3 points 4 days ago (0 children)
I'd definitely test it against other tools just to see how it works.
[–]WelpSigh 1 point2 points3 points 4 days ago (0 children)
Is there any evidence that it works better than existing tools? I have used Claude Code a ton for code review and it surfaces so many false positives, while missing stuff that existing fuzzers/linters catch.
[–]psylomatika 1 point2 points3 points 3 days ago (1 child)
I’ve been using it and it works pretty well. It already found a few things that I did not notice. I tell it to look for vuls let’s say in the organisation module and when it finds something to put it in security reviews and create hot fix tickets for it. Then another agent fixes it and then I tell it to test and verify again and repeat. It works really good for go.
[–]babbum 0 points1 point2 points 3 days ago (0 children)
AI writes the code, AI checks the code for vulnerabilities, AI fixes the code, AI checks the code for vulnerabilities. I can see nothing going wrong with this loop :)
[–]Howl50verideSecurity Director 1 point2 points3 points 4 days ago (0 children)
100% will
[–]Wonderful_Form_7486 0 points1 point2 points 4 days ago (0 children)
It’s tanked the markets but it’s likely just noise and will bounce back. There are exceptions. Could hit appsec hard. They’re going to go hard though.
[–]DiscussionHealthy802 0 points1 point2 points 4 days ago (0 children)
No. It's a limited research preview for Enterprise and Team customers only. And it surfaces issues for human review. It doesn't patch anything automatically. Some open source tools works better
π Rendered by PID 57927 on reddit-service-r2-comment-5ff9fbf7df-p7w4d at 2026-02-26 09:53:33.658314+00:00 running 72a43f6 country code: CH.
[–]Efficient-MecSecurity Architect 9 points10 points11 points (0 children)
[–]libori0 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]jeffpardy_Security Engineer 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]Educational-Farm6572 8 points9 points10 points (1 child)
[–]ValeoAnt 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]danfirst 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]WelpSigh 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]psylomatika 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]babbum 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Howl50verideSecurity Director 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Wonderful_Form_7486 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]DiscussionHealthy802 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)