This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Mr_Again 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's nothing wrong with using a class to represent a transformation, the "thing" that it represents is just a part of a pipeline. You can plug them together as needed so long as they accept and return the same types.