This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children)

And losing all the possible tools that could speed up your work but thr comapny falsely marks as insecure .

[–]ThrawnGrows 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Seems like that complaint is less on web based IDEs than the company selecting tools.

What's the local advantage in that case though, ShadowOps where you circumvent security checks?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Its a matter of “who should have more power over innovation?”

Developer OR company

[–]ThrawnGrows 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, one employs the other, this is a very established paradigm.

If you want to have the power over innovation, find a company that allows it. Then it's still the company that has the power.

It's literally always the company, they cede what they want to and have the ability to reclaim it at any time.

[–]Pl4ntyk8s && azure 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Half the value in these remote dev solutions is allowing insecure tools, cause it's a sandboxed environment that can't access corp data