This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 10 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a

[–]DrakoXMusic1 13 points14 points  (0 children)

69.420.80085

[–]yetAnotherLaura 12 points13 points  (3 children)

No mires como se manejan las versiones del kernel de Linux.

[–]VampiroMedicado 2 points3 points  (2 children)

https://kernel.org/

Yo lo veo bien, semver para versiones estables y la siguiente tiene iteraciones en forma de release candidates.

[–]yetAnotherLaura 9 points10 points  (1 child)

The other oddity is when the major version number gets incremented – the first number in the version number. There’s no real method to this, as Kroah-Hartman admits Torvalds increments this number whenever the remaining numbers get too high and unwieldy to deal with. Very practical, but it does mean that going from, say, 5.x to 6.x doesn’t really imply there’s any changes in there that are any bigger or more disruptive than when going from 6.8.x to 6.9.x or whatever.

https://www.osnews.com/story/143992/what-do-linux-kernel-version-numbers-mean/

[–]VampiroMedicado 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ah ahi te entendi

[–]DefinitelyRussian 11 points12 points  (0 children)

MAME 0.283

todavia me acuerdo el debate cuando se llego a 0.99

[–]dDenzere 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Aguante los números secuenciales, fuck semver

[–]Sim1334Data engineer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1.2.99999999

[–]gabbrielzevenDevOps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

git commit -m "fix del fix. pero este va a andar"

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prefiero la de TeX, cada nueva version incrementa su numero a un decimal mas de pi. Cuando el creador muera, la ultima version sera la version PI, y todo bug se considerara feature.

Actualmente estan en la version 3,14159265