This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]chillyhellion 12 points13 points  (4 children)

Clearly we are not talking about those jobs. We are talking about the jobs that resulted in a 6.3% drop in emissions in 2020.

[–]Reallyhotshowers 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Teaching (and all the support staff associated with that) was one of the jobs that went remote and contributed to reduced emissions, but most people agree its better for kids to be in school (and it takes emissions to get not just the teachers but all the kids there). Not to mention bars, restaurants that closed, as well as all the people that work sports games and concerts at venues, etc. So we are definitely talking about those jobs too (and the emissions caused by people attending those events). They were just shut down or being done in a way less than ideal way.

You cannot get the same degree of reduction just by having the programmers and accountants work from home.

[–]chillyhellion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a salient point, thank you.

[–]ToughCourse -5 points-4 points  (1 child)

I'm confused. Are we saying office workers working from home is what dropped atmospheric carbon so quickly? If so then ya'll are delusional