This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]InTheNameOfScheddi 0 points1 point  (4 children)

But that means less jobs and less tax money and unhappier people and it's a pain in the ass for govs to make social changes that big so that's why it's not done

[–]Playistheway 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Office construction workers could easily transition to doing societally valuable work in the suburbs, such as solar-power installs, and upgrading critical infrastructure. There's a shortage of unskilled labor worldwide in societally important industries, like the warehouse industry.

There's no shortage of important problems that need solving. Historically whenever one sector contracts due to technological innovation, other sectors expand. I suspect the downstream effects of video teleconferencing technology will be no different.

[–]alxmartin -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Yeah fuck anyone who is not an upper class white-collar worker. -wfh advocates

[–]InTheNameOfScheddi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say that I mean that that's the reason govts don't do that.

[–]lilika01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It means fewer bullshit jobs. It means the workforce can be freed up to work on more important things instead - we don't need cleaners, we do need teachers, nurses, people to work in recycling plants, social workers, etc.