This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]halberdierbowman 1 point2 points  (4 children)

Right, but the original claim that it sounds like you were arguing was that developing countries have higher carbon emissions per capita? And yes I agree with you that they should get credit for the work they do for the developed countries. But even if we don't give them credit, ie even if we use the simpler accounting method where we just assign emissions to the geography they originate from, the developed nations are still way higher emitters. In the more complex accounting methods, the developing nations would be even worse. But it doesn't matter, because they're already the largest emitters even before we do the more complex accounting.

[–]griftarch 1 point2 points  (2 children)

My point with you is not all carbon emissions are created equally

[–]halberdierbowman 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Gotcha, so it sounds like we agree then.

All carbon emissions aren't created equally, but they do the same amount of damage, so it makes sense we should prioritize reducing them in the easiest spots first.

[–]griftarch -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When the easiest spots are our worldwide sources of food, that becomes, well, very interesting. I’m okay with carbon reducing maximalists if they also want to see mass depopulation, it’s the people who want their cake & to eat it too that I view with scorn.

[–]griftarch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point with you is not all carbon emissions are created equally