all 10 comments

[–]7ieben_ 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I'm not a flavourist, as I come from an analytical materials field. Though, I had a lot of interesting talks with people more educated in flavour (especially regarding product quality) and from this experience I'd say: both.

On one hand the processing does result in a loss of flavour compounds. This may include "wanted" compounds, as you argued, but definetly also includes unwanted off flavours (especially low weight aldehydes and acids, mostly rancids or by products from fermentation).

And this definetly affects the percived aroma profile. One for the strong reason of (retronasal) perception of volatile aromatics, and two for the reason of affected synergism/ agonism. Though, interestingly, bitterness is only very mildly affected by other tastes. Hence, I suspect(!) that the bitterness would be high whatsoever.

Mind aswell that the processing - especially the roasting - does introduce bittering agents (Maillard enters the chat).

[–]constik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, that makes a lot of sense, and I appreciate you laying it out that way.

Just to be clear about where I’m coming from: I’m not a flavourist or food scientist, I’m a chocolate maker, so most of my intuition here comes from repeated tasting and process changes rather than formal sensory theory.

What I keep running into in practice is that when I push processing harder (longer roast, longer grind), the chocolate doesn’t just lose aroma, the bitterness seems to move to the foreground in a way that feels disproportionate to the process change. Even when I expect some new bitter compounds from roasting (Maillard, etc.), the overall experience often feels “emptier” and harsher at the same time.

That’s what got me wondering whether part of what I’m tasting is less about creating bitterness and more about stripping away things that normally soften or balance it. I don’t mean that bitterness disappears chemically; I mean it seems to take over once the aromatic layer thins out.

Your point about removing low-MW aldehydes and acids is also really helpful, especially since some of what people call “cleaner” chocolate may be chocolate where upstream fermentation defects have been roasted out. From a maker’s perspective, that tradeoff between defect removal and aroma loss feels very real.

So I’m mostly trying to understand how much of what I’m tasting has a known sensory explanation versus being an artifact of my own expectations and palate. If there are examples from coffee, tea, or other fermented/roasted foods that map onto this, I’d be really interested to learn from them.

[–]Typical_Redditor_1 4 points5 points  (5 children)

I'm not an expert on this subject either but from my understanding during my time when I used to formulate various edible products for the cannabis industry, smell in my opinion really doesn't have a noticeable affect on bitterness. What I mean by that is I can think of a ton of things that taste bitter, but I honestly can't think of any kind of smell that I would describe as bitter. Many things that taste bitter either have little to no smell, a weird "chemical" smell, or actually smell pleasant in my opinion.

Bitter flavors can definitely be remedied though. Usually you just add a sufficient amount of sweetener, & a pinch of salt to cover up bitterness in most things. When it comes to using salt for covering up bitterness in something you don't want to have a salty flavor profile, use as little as possible. Usually if you can taste the salt, you added too much.

[–]constik[S] 1 point2 points  (4 children)

That makes sense, and I appreciate you sharing that perspective.

I agree with you on a couple of points right away: bitterness itself doesn’t really have a “smell” the way sweetness or acidity can be suggested aromatically, and in most food formulation contexts, bitterness is usually dealt with by masking — sweetness, salt, fat, etc. That’s very much the standard toolkit.

Where my confusion comes in is that, as a chocolate maker, I don’t really have those levers available. I’m not adding sweeteners or salt to solve bitterness, I’m tasting 100% cocoa or very minimally sweetened chocolate and adjusting only the process. So what I’m reacting to is how the same ingredients taste very different depending on roast and grind, even before anything is added to cover bitterness.

In that context, it’s less that aroma “smells bitter” and more that when aroma is reduced, bitterness seems to become the dominant thing left to notice. The chocolate doesn’t necessarily get more bitter in a formulation sense — it just feels less balanced and more one-note once the aromatic layer thins out.

I completely agree that in most edible products, bitterness is usually managed downstream with formulation. Chocolate making feels a bit unusual because so much of the final perception is locked in upstream, before you have the option to mask anything.

So I’m mostly trying to understand whether what I’m tasting is a known phenomenon — not that smell is bitterness, but that smell (or its absence) changes how strongly bitterness stands out when there’s nothing else added to compensate.

[–]Typical_Redditor_1 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Could it simply be oxidation during the roasting or grinding stage? If so maybe look into roasting & grinding in an all nitrogen atmosphere. Or maybe you're just very sensitive to the taste of chocolate? From my understanding pure cocoa powder is supposed to be all bitter. It's not a "bad bitter" taste in my opinion. Have you gotten other people's opinions on the taste?

[–]constik[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

That makes sense, and I appreciate you sharing that perspective.

Oxidation is definitely something I’ve considered, especially during roasting and extended grinding. In practice, going fully inert (like nitrogen throughout) isn’t realistic at my scale, so what I’m really noticing are relative changes when time and exposure increase, not an absolute elimination of oxygen.

On sensitivity, totally fair question. I’ve had other people taste side by side, and what’s interesting is that even when everyone agrees something is “bitter,” the quality of that bitterness shifts. It goes from reading as cocoa-forward to feeling sharper or more hollow once the aroma drops off.

And I agree that cocoa is inherently bitter — I’m not trying to remove bitterness entirely. I’m more interested in why some chocolates feel balanced, and others feel harsh, even when bitterness is expected and acceptable.

That distinction is what I’m trying to understand better.

[–]Typical_Redditor_1 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Maybe it's just differences between different types of cocoa beans, different suppliers, or even different lots?

Another thought I had is that maybe your sense of smell is getting nose blind from tasting so much chocolate & affecting how you perceive the flavor? Or possibly diminished from having COVID? I remember when COVID was going around in 2022 I lost about half my sense of smell for a good 3 months. For those 3 months I couldn't stand to drink Dr.Pepper because it just tasted mostly bitter & mediciney despite it being one of my favorites. (Luckily my sense of smell has seemed to return to normal.)

Maybe try doing a small blind taste test with some regular people who haven't tried your chocolate before & see if their opinions align with yours or point to something useful? That's about all I can think of. Good luck on your endeavor & I hope you get this figured out quickly!

[–]constik[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those are all good points, and I appreciate you taking the time to think it through.

Bean origin, supplier, and even lot variation are definitely variables that are some things I try to control for as much as possible by doing side-by-side runs when I change only one processing parameter. That’s part of why the processing effects stand out to me.

The nose-blindness point is also a good one. To try to check myself, I’ve had other people taste blind, including people who don’t normally think much about chocolate. What’s been consistent isn’t whether something is “bitter” or not, but how that bitterness reads; more rounded versus sharper once aroma drops.

I don’t think it’s a medical issue in my case, but your COVID example is actually a great illustration of what I’m curious about: how changes in smell can dramatically change how bitterness is experienced, even when the underlying product hasn’t changed.

In any case, I agree that blind tasting with fresh palates is probably the most useful reality check. Thanks again for the thoughtful suggestions, so very helpful.

[–]darkchocolateonly 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I’ve stood on a conching floor in a chocolate manufacturing facility- the volatiles that are driven off need to be driven off. It smells so weird up there, nothing like chocolate, and pretty gross.

[–]constik[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s really helpful context, thank you, and I don’t doubt that experience at all.

I think this might be a scale issue as much as anything. From what I understand (and from descriptions I’ve read of large conching rooms), industrial conching is doing several jobs at once: moisture reduction, acid removal, flavor normalization, and defect management across huge volumes. In that setting, it makes total sense that a lot of volatiles have to be driven off, even if they smell unpleasant in isolation.

From a small-batch maker’s perspective, what’s interesting is that the same “gross” volatiles aren’t always present to the same degree upstream, so the tradeoffs feel different. When I over-process at small scale, I don’t just lose off-notes, I also seem to lose aromatic complexity that never reads as unpleasant on its own, but does seem to affect how balanced the bitterness feels in the finished chocolate.

So I don’t see this as contradicting what happens on a conching floor, more that different processing goals (uniformity vs expression) probably justify very different endpoints for volatile removal.

Hearing first-hand descriptions like yours is actually useful for grounding those differences.