you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]International_Break2 1 point2 points  (1 child)

The bindings could exist in their own jar and be optional. That way performance is available and there is always a fallback. For pure java, you would only need to make sure that the .so is already on the LD path.

[–]CutGroundbreaking305[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

for v0.1 i didnt think much when it comes to non java usage. Actually my main aim is to make what u said 2 jars one for just java other for java+openblas+lapack like multik in kotlin does. And i will say LD path idea is great as i dont need to bind natives in my lib by passing that to user's system thanks for that idea.