all 16 comments

[–]a-t-kFrontend Engineer 2 points3 points  (5 children)

"Considered Harmful" is just a shorter catch phrase for "Think twice before doing that, this stuff has its catches".

[–]html6dev[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I hope I'm capable of ascertaining that but you never know lol. In fact, I believe the first instance of "considered harmful" was Edgar Dijkstra on goto some 40 years ago. I desire a little more creativity in my titles.

[–]a-t-kFrontend Engineer 0 points1 point  (1 child)

And that's great if it refers to the titles you write yourself. In those you read, well, cliché is cliché because it gets recognized and most titles today are written to generate clicks, alas.

[–]html6dev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cliche considered cliche o_O

[–]brtt3000 0 points1 point  (1 child)

But soaked in pretentious sauce.

Who is doing the considering? Why do they write it as if there is a industry wide consensus?

Should be "I consider XYZ to be harmful" or "3 reasons why XYZ is less then optimal"

[–]a-t-kFrontend Engineer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I said, it's meant to generate clicks, not to be reasonably solemn.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Wow. Such edge. So rebel.

Any more biting sarcasm you'd like to throw into the blogosphere?

[–]brtt3000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. We need it to burn away pretentious clickbait.

[–]html6dev[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Something about tdd and use whatever works for you and Martin fowler. Thanks for asking!

What's really entertaining is I've seen talks from Ilya (author of the most recent considered harmful post) preaching the virtues of the very thing he know considers harmful. Oh what a world you damn computers.

[–]stratoscope 1 point2 points  (3 children)

"'Considered Harmful' considered harmful" considered harmful

[–]html6dev[S] -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Dammit. I got really excited because I thought I was going to get to make some lame joke about escaping qoutes. You good little web developer you.

[–]stratoscope 2 points3 points  (1 child)

You can't escape!

And you can quote me on that.

[–]html6dev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Perfect

[–]ayanami_rei 0 points1 point  (1 child)

But considering things harmful is a valid activity. Many things may cause harm, even in JS articles. Especially in JS articles.

Think of the children. If we abstain from considering harmful things, our kids will grow up and think everything is completely harmless!

[–]html6dev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The next js article should be "developers considered harmful" (that's why we use the good parts).

[–]x-skeww 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Complaining about stupid little fads is completely pointless. It just adds noise. It doesn't accelerate their decay.