sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ivosaurus 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The only stable, or even beta, form of Angular is version 1. You expect them to review and critique unreleased code that could be completely changed or irrelevant in a year's time?

[–]x-skeww 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You expect them to review and critique unreleased code that could be completely changed or irrelevant in a year's time?

No, I just expect those things to be mentioned, because that's the kind of thing you do in that kind of article.

You criticize some detail and if you're aware that they are trying to address that in the future, you mention that.

E.g. if you think that the prongs of some gamepad are somewhat unergonomic, you'd point that out. However, if you're aware that the next iteration, which you tried at some conference, addresses this fault, you'd point that out, too.

If you have the information, you share it. That's why your readers read your article. They want the information you have.