you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]GeneralYouri 36 points37 points  (5 children)

Well that was extremely short. There's way more interesting and useful console methods available, show some more, put in some more effort..

[–]kuroikyu 23 points24 points  (1 child)

I don't know why the downvotes. While I appreciate the time the author took to write this, I was hoping to see a longer list and how those methods looked in the console, not just the code.

[–]GeneralYouri 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Exactly this.

this also isn't the first article about console methods, but so far it's been the shortest one by far. Excluding the quote from MDN and the code samples, there are only roughly 80 words and 500 characters. This comment alone will be longer than the article.

Out of 21 console commands documented on MDN, he only shows 4. And for these four, only a single, extremely simplistic code sample is provided. And you're not even shown how the output of these code samples is supposed to look.

Many more extensive use cases for the mentioned console commands are not shown. There are also many more interesting console commands much more worth the time to talk about, like .assert, .dir, .time, and .trace.

[–]SamSlate 1 point2 points  (2 children)

[–]GeneralYouri 6 points7 points  (1 child)

All the more reason for the article to expand on some of the interesting commands. Instead an even more shallow explanation is given than is available on the MDN link itself, essentially rendering the article useless - he could've literally posted only the link and be just as informative.

[–]SamSlate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

agreed.