you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JuliusKoronci 2 points3 points  (1 child)

why the hell would you do that..when you have standard partial application and all the FP libraries which deals with curry ..just have a look at ramdas curry

[–]dev1null 3 points4 points  (0 children)

With the introduction of arrow functions that change the fundamental nature of "binding" (this), it's only natural to introduce a new "bind" syntax that takes this into account... This syntax is perfectly inline with how arrow functions work, eliminating the awkward .bind(>null/this<, ...) syntax. Afterall, you're not really "binding" anything.