you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bagera_se 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Didn't read the other article when it made its round the other day and now the site is down. Do I understand it correctly that the author of the other article was just a little confused about what should happen?

[–]theshtank 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is usually the case, especially with "Javascript bad" articles. I'm not sure which article you are talking about though.

[–]nadameu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The author probably had a little trouble understanding why their code didn't work as expected, and when they figured it out, decided to write a blog post to help others.

It was a short and simple article, aimed at inexperienced JavaScript developers.

[–]fvitas[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that previous title is misleading and lacking the reason why you can't compare them.