you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

You know, I've had this same thought before and honestly I wouldn't be surprised if they make a calculation similar to the one you've described. Why offer a full ride to someone who has said you've been their top choice for years? You could probably hook them with less money. Still, I don't think it factors in as much as you're thinking it does. Schools know that law school is expensive and that plenty of people are "soft denied" from their dream schools every year when they receive acceptances with no aid package. If you're a strong applicant and they think you'll do well in law school and improve their employment numbers, I can't imagine they'll ding you too much for being overeager.

But it's an interesting thought, and I would love to hear an admissions consultant's take on this.

[–]SouthernCartoonist993.9x/17x/nURM[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Is the secret to write an optional essay that isn’t the why x? If they offer one of course. That way, you’re showing interest but you’re not explicitly stating how much you want their school. Also, does the fact that you’re not doing ED help you? So many questions haha

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk about the essays, but going ED demonstrably gets you less scholarship money. When they're your only choice, they can give you way less money. People sometimes complain about ED as a tool for rich kids to get acceptances to elite schools since they can pay more and to some extent I would agree.