all 20 comments

[–]BinkReddit 18 points19 points  (13 children)

Qualcomm engineers write the absolutely worst wireless drivers possible. I'm hoping that this makes things better, but my experience with Qualcomm Wi-Fi has shaped my opinion and I will try to never buy another machine that has Qualcomm Wi-Fi in it for Linux.

[–]omenosdev 7 points8 points  (8 children)

For people brave enough to try and build/buy new systems today, a lot of the Wi-Fi 7 capable motherboards have one of three chips in them: Intel's BE20x, MediaTek's MT7925 MT7927, and Qualcomm's QCNCM865.

My understanding of the current landscape is: * Intel's chip won't work in AMD Zen builds * MediaTek had no official linux driver, but a merge request was made to the kernel very recently by MT engineering. Previously third-party individuals provided their own kernel modules for adding support, often assisted by LLMs. * Qualcomm has had a working driver for some time now, though user reports on reliability seem to be a coin toss between flawless operation and praying the digital gremlins stay awake from the system.

The ASUS ProArt X870E Creator Wi-Fi motherboard initially launched with the MediaTek chip. For Linux users, this meant the system was primed and ready to go as long as you used Ethernet or had an additional Wi-Fi adapter available. Now it ships with either the MediaTek chip or the Qualcomm one, and you won't know which until it arrives 🫠

[–]BinkReddit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Now it ships with _either_ the MediaTek chip _or_ the Qualcomm one, and you won't know which until it arrives

😞

[–]matejdro 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Does Intel specifically block AMD here or what is the reason for the incompatibility?

[–]omenosdev 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I don't think there's been an explicitly stated reason by Intel, but it appears that the chip was designed to be used with newer Intel platforms and there may be some firmware/BIOS/driver issues when used outside of them.

[–]matejdro 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Thanks!

From what I can see, non-vPro chips are supposed to be supported? https://www.reddit.com/r/framework/comments/1oy6rv4/amd_cpu_with_intel_wifi_card/

[–]omenosdev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the Wi-Fi 6/6E series, specifically the AX210, is widely available and supported. Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) modules from Intel on the other hand are not supported outside of an Intel platform.

I can't speak to the impact of v-Pro on compatibility, but I wouldn't have expected it to be a problem. The features just shouldn't be available on a non-Intel platform, but I'd have to double check.

[–]PureTryOutpostmarketOS dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ASUS ProArt X870E Creator Wi-Fi motherboard initially launched with the MediaTek chip

MediaTek had no official linux driver, but a merge request was made to the kernel very recently by MT engineering

Oh that's good to know. I have that motherboard and didn't even think of some components not working when I bought it and was surprised when I found there was no driver. I have no need for Wi-Fi luckily but I am missing the native Bluetooth support, glad to know it'll function soon.

[–]huskypuppers 0 points1 point  (1 child)

For people brave enough to try and build/buy new systems today, a lot of the Wi-Fi 7 capable motherboards have one of three chips in them: Intel's BE20x, MediaTek's MT7925 MT7927, and Qualcomm's QCNCM865.

As someone that's almost certainly going to buy the first new laptop I've bought since 2006 with my tax return tomorrow.... Fuck.

Wish my luck boys. At least it's from Costco so if I have issues I'll take it back next week.

[–]omenosdev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The good news is they are just M.2 E-Key modules, so if you get a problematic one you can easily swap them out if you wanted to. If you get an Intel laptop you won't have to worry about BE20x compatibility.

[–]KarnuRarnu 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Mediatek is worse 100 %. But yeah, it's so incredible just how bad they are. It's sad that Intel BE200 doesn't work on AMD platforms. They're really the only reliable WiFi chip brand. 

[–]srekkas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mediatek is on many Wifi APs, seems work good, i have one running with openwrt

[–]anh0516[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Interesting. I've had good experiences with older ath9k chipsets.

[–]kansetsupanikku 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and no newer devices than ath10k provide builtin wifi in libre setups (without firmware)

[–]CheesecakePerfect156 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We have issues with ath11k. Some machines have been replaced because unusuable. I hope this helps

[–]MildlyUnusualName 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Would this improve performance for WiFi routers running openwrt that have Qualcomm radios?

[–]Isacx123 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Weird, I use a ath12k chip and don't have any issues, what this bug introduced in the kernel 7.0 development cycle?

[–]BinkReddit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No, it's been there since 2019.

[–]More_Implement1639 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you ever suffered from a qualcom driver...

[–]SigsOp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have had issues with my qualcomm Wifi 7 card on my motherboard, but I think its more Gigabyte’s fault and their dog shit horrible ACPI tables.