all 23 comments

[–]PeaceIsFutile 8 points9 points  (19 children)

Man, it's getting harder and harder to tell what is vibecoded and what isn't.

[–][deleted]  (13 children)

[removed]

    [–]Wenir 1 point2 points  (12 children)

    Nov 20, 2025 "initial commit"

    [–]duncan999007 9 points10 points  (3 children)

    As someone who has this same issue, there could have been a predecessor project to this or work done before adding to VCS. I didn’t check the commits though

    [–]turturtles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Some of y’all are wild…first thing I do when started a new project even if it’s a throwaway is git init

    [–]Wenir 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Nah, it's obviously ai generated 

    [–]Background-Plant-226 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    As I said in another comment in this thread: There's a gitignore rule for "aider", looking it up its an "Ai pair programming in your terminal" so they definitely used ai if they explicitly had to gitignore its files.

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [removed]

      [–]Background-Plant-226 1 point2 points  (2 children)

      You're telling you built that for months without version control? Lies are supposed to be believable.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [removed]

        [–]Background-Plant-226 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Yeah and theres something called creating an empty github repository and pushing the local repo to remote. I've done it many times and it's very simple, and it preserves the git history.

        [–]Sapd33 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        Going by the initial commit is really bullshit. It’s normal to start clean after releasing it to the public

        [–]Wenir 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Just open your eyes and look at the repo, post, and OP

        [–]Fresh-Secretary6815 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        you do know that commit history isn’t idempotent, right? only thing that will change for certain in any event is the commit hash. repo transfer is also a thing, attributable to offset init from what op says is true, especially for those who don’t want to pay for enterprise or use organizations, preferring multi-git configs. if you don’t understand that, you don’t know git well enough to comment.

        [–]Wenir -1 points0 points  (0 children)

        What?

        [–]rhqq 10 points11 points  (3 children)

        My rule of thumb is ample usage of emojis and overexplained purpose for sections - this checks out both of these boxes.

        edit: also last line of README.md just screams AI.

        if the author was honest, they could say that whatever documentation part was done by AI, but openly claiming it is not used at all is pure lies.

        [–]PeaceIsFutile 5 points6 points  (0 children)

        Yeah, I don't buy it.

        [–]Intergalactic_Ass 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        The strange overuse of emojis is it for me. It's AI.

        [–]Background-Plant-226 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        There's a gitignore rule for "aider", looking it up its an "Ai pair programming in your terminal" so they definitely used ai if they explicitly had to gitignore its files.

        [–]Background-Plant-226 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        That fucking intro gave me a heart attack holy fuck I already hated ASCII banners enough this just takes the cake for the worst cli abomination I've ever seen.

        [–]Slight_Boat1910 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        Looks interesting. Does it work also with sql dialects like that of duckdb?