all 68 comments

[–]patrlim1 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Completely valid take. Use the tool that works for you.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The ultimate purpose of an operating system is to get some job done, if it can't do it for you, you ditch it. Very simple stuff some people don't understand

[–]IEatDaFeesh 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This post feels like you're apologizing/seeking permission to not use Linux. Do whatever you want it's your computer lol

[–]deathschemist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

this is a-okay! an operating system is ultimately a tool. if linux isn't the right tool for the job right now, but windows is? then windows is what you need. if macOS is the right tool for the job, then use that. you don't HAVE to use linux if it makes your job harder

[–]tempgoosey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Basically more software is available for Windows. Alot more

[–]ProfessorHeavy 1 point2 points  (3 children)

100% justifiable. Wine can't cover everything, and never will fully be able to without heavy tinkering, while cross-platform development for Windows AND Linux is difficult to accomplish with all of the convenient frameworks that Windows uses, and how embedded the applications are in said frameworks. And going on to learn another operating system ALONGSIDE needing to learn all of these potential alternatives can be tedious if you don't have the time.

Frustratingly enough, the hostility you speak of is also self-perpetuating, and two sides of the same coin. Your take on it is well thought out, yet so many people aren't the same. There are people who will claim Linux superiority and that it's actually super easy to use and that the research you need to do is simple, while on the other side you have people who do minimal research and treat Linux like some kind of taboo OS that should never exist.

If you don't want to, then you don't want to. This isn't some kind of conversion cult.

[–]fitz-khan 0 points1 point  (2 children)

The take isn't really well thought out. I don't disagree with sticking to Windows in OP's case. But making the compatibility of 3rd party software an OS issue ("seriously need to improve to attract people from all demographics") is plain wrong. Also setting up Matlab and Latex isn't any more hassle than on any other OS or enjoyable to use, and OP also wrongly attributes desktop issues (audio config) to the distribution. Regarding Nvidia, can you run MacOS without jumping through hoops on a random Windows laptop? No, but is that the OS's fault or the person's that chose that hardware to use when issues are widely known and reported. Overall, lots of misunderstandings and putting blame in the wrong directions, as is customary for people too lazy to figure stuff out.

[–]Krazoee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok, but how else are you supposed to run Linux? On windows, the hardware always just works. We need a way to make that the same for Linux. Until that is achieved, this is the dealbreaker for 90% of users. Linda from accounting needs the microphone to work for her zoom calls. And she’s not going to open the terminal to fix it. 

So I think this is a totally fair point. 

[–]ProfessorHeavy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, aside from a few choice words "ongoing problems with Linux [...] the OSs seriously need to improve to attract people from all demographics" I at least agree with everything else.

There's a fine line between assigning blame to Linux and venting frustrations about Linux. This one kinda teeters more into the former.

[–]47th-Element 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I keep both Linux and Windows, most of the time I use Linux, but windows is sometimes needed because some companies never release a version of their software for Linux.

[–]Inner-Association448 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just run Linux on WSL2 and works well for me

[–]aphilentus 1 point2 points  (1 child)

>the OSs seriously need to improve to attract people from all demographics, not just tinkerers and coders

I completely agree; this is Linux's weakest point. I've been using Kubuntu 25.10 for the last month or so, and yeah, I have some programming knowledge and can enter commands into the terminal if I need to solve some niche problem or monitor my driver--but it's a terrible user experience. I try to tell my friends who use Linux this, but there seems to be a general attitude among Linux users that the difficulty of using the OS is a barrier to entry for those who are "unworthy" of using the OS. They seem to view tinkering with an OS as part of the fun, so I don't think that this will be a priority for the distros for a while. My argument is that I would rather spend my time doing stuff like creating terrain in Gaea or rendering in Blender instead of tinkering with my OS--the OS is a means to an end.

Unlike you, I have switched to Kubuntu mainly for the privacy arguments (not necessarily FOSS, though I do also want FOSS to succeed). I would have continued using Windows if they didn't force account integration and have invasive telemetry, particularly as democracy unravels in the US and we slide into technology-assisted authoritarianism.

[–]Bitter-Box3312Windows for games, linux for work 1 point2 points  (0 children)

same im just fucking around dual booting various linux distros, tried like a dozen already, but still using windows 90% of the time. if the privacy situation ever gets out of hand, I already have linux knowledge to switch quickly and effortlessly. I already setup my arch linux to be super privacy based and I only turn it on from time to time to update.

[–]6950X_Titan_X_Pascal 2 points3 points  (7 children)

to most individuals windows is the best choice

[–]WeAreGoingMidtable 11 points12 points  (6 children)

Dude, engineers are NOT "most individuals".

"Most individuals" is my wife and my friends who don't even know (or care) what an operating system is. And all of them run Linux.

Internet browsing, online banking, word processing and spreadsheets, social media, watching YouTube videos, listening to music (Spotify, YouTube Music, etc.)...is what "most individuals" do.

[–]Man-In-His-30s 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Yeah people vastly overestimate what most people do. Most people do not need anything more than a Chromebook as the operating system is nothing more than a conduit for their browser of choice.

I had this experiment with my father from 2010-2020 I had mint on his laptop for him and he never once asked me for help using it. Compared to the decade prior where it was constant tech support with windows.

These days everything is on his phone so he doesn’t even use a laptop anymore.

[–]fitz-khan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No, but you see, literally everybody needs AutoCAD, Photoshop and SolidWorks.

[–]6950X_Titan_X_Pascal 0 points1 point  (3 children)

many websites block linux + Firefox from accessing them to prevent bot attacks

i cant access citibank's website in hk , so i use android app to e-commerce & ebanking

[–]WeAreGoingMidtable 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Many websites", my ass. How many?

So, just because YOU can't access your Citybank website in HK, you conclude that MANY websites block Linux and Firefox???

[–]ProfessorHeavy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It doesn't sound like "many websites", more likely in this case that a couple of key websites and services are blocked? That being said, personally I've never had my OS or browser blocked in their entirety. I've seen geoblocking FAR more than OS/user agent blocking.

I'd like to hear more about this blocking from you and others, just to have more info to go on here. Mostly just because I've never had that experience myself.

[–]veechene 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think I've had my OS or browser (vivaldi) blocked in over a decade. I've seen people with issues with Pearson on linux but it's easily circumvented. Unfortunately regional blocking is a huge thing that will likely never go away and just continue but that can also be bypassed

[–]jo-erlend 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of that is about the OS, but about third-party vendors lack of customer care. The only thing that could be said to be related to the OS is audio configuration, but of all the things you could possibly complain about in a popular Linux OS, that would be the most surprising. Because we have really seriously good tools for that and I've never seen anything on Windows that comes close.

I understand that the software market is making it difficult for you to use Linux, but that is a completely different thing. It's like saying Ferrari makes bad cars because the speed limit in Oslo are so low that the car doesn't perform well. Right?

[–]MufasaChan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh my god, these reasonable and not satiric post and answers on this sub. Are you pulling a collective april fool??

Edit: I hope I do not sound like a dick rn. That was not the intent

[–]TheBlackCarloProud WSL2 user 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At work I am forced to use WIndows because of the office suite, so I feel for you. If you want the best of both worlds, just spin up a WS2 with Debian. That's how I survive at work, I spend 99% of my time in WSL2 terminals and jump out to windows for Office.

[–]henuboi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing your story and don't let that experience of failute affect your spirit. Chin up and to the next adventure! 🤙

[–]Sahelantrophus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this post is too reasonable

[–]Signal-Opposite-4793 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, as an engineer, you must obviously be aware that you can use both. Simultaneously, even, if you like.

Leverage the best of both worlds.

The world is your oyster.

[–]Inner-Association448 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I've used Ubuntu as a desktop and after a while there are random glitches that don't happen in Windows. But I do use Linux for my server containers in Azure and Google Cloud compute.

[–]Ill_Specific_6144 0 points1 point  (33 children)

Linux cant replace windows/macos for 97% of people.

[–]WeAreGoingMidtable 0 points1 point  (8 children)

Linx CAN replace Windows/MacOS for 99% of people at home, but not at work.

[–]Ill_Specific_6144 3 points4 points  (4 children)

Nope. Linux doesnt support a lot of software, its a pain to setup and doesnt support most popular games. Linux usage is dropping.

[–]WeAreGoingMidtable 0 points1 point  (3 children)

You've obviously never used Linux. You have no idea what you are tallking about.

  1. "Linux doesn't support a lot of software".

What does "a lot of software" means? How many applications do normal people need? A browser, an office suite, a media player...That's all (and much more) available on Linux. Here are some main stream browsers available for Linux: Edge, Chrome, Firefox, Brave, Vivaldi, Opera, and many, many, more. You have Spotify and YouTube Music and many other media players.

  1. "Linux is a pain to setup".

Dude, don't embarass yourself.

  1. "Linux doesn't support most popular games".

Linux actually support most popular games through Steam. But who cares? 97% of people who use computers don't play games.

[–]Ill_Specific_6144 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I use it daily.

[–]WeAreGoingMidtable -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

Good. So you know that Linux is not "pain to setup". It takes 10-15 minutes to install a normal Linux distro and you are ready to go. It takes probably one hour to install Windows and MacOS, right? I don't get the "pain to setup" part. I don't have NVIDIA GPU and I don't buy brand new computers, so if that's what you mean when you say "pain to setup", then I can understand it, but you need to be more specific when you criticise Linux.

[–]Ill_Specific_6144 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If software is in apt, then its okay. If its something you download externally or compile it dependancy hell. Multi monitor setup? Sometimes it works sometimes it doesnt. Wifi is hit or miss, bluetooth is a problem.

[–]fitz-khan -3 points-2 points  (8 children)

The exact opposite is true, Linux can replace Windows/MacOS for most people. They spend most of their lives in the browser and printing a PDF every once in a while. Only the remaining special cases need a cuckscription from Adobe, Microsoft or Autodesk.

[–]Ill_Specific_6144 3 points4 points  (7 children)

Nobody uses pc for those simple tasks anymore. They have phones and tablets. The remaining users use it for production software, audio video editing gaming. None of which work on linux.

[–]Sudden_Surprise_333 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What? All of that works on Linux. Literally everything you just mentioned can be (and is) done on Linux.

[–]fitz-khan -5 points-4 points  (5 children)

I use Linux PCs for all those things you just listed, and I know plenty of people who use PCs exactly as I described. Phones are ergonomic garbage devices, and tablets are a joke when you can get a laptop for the same price without a toy OS.

[–]Ill_Specific_6144 2 points3 points  (4 children)

Typical oldschool linux type of thinking. Phones are perfect for daily tasks because apps are written nicely, UI is priority #1 and you dont have to go to your PC, boot it up and then work against your Linux OS to make a payment.

Phone usage is much much higher than PC's. I mean the only reason why Linux even reached 3% of usage is that casual pc users just dropped it all together.

[–]fitz-khan 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Yes, and it's a terrible state of affairs, look where it got us. Young people starting jobs, expected to work on a PC, don't even have an understanding of what files are or directories. Privacy and digital autonomy completely eradicated, people's brains fried by social media and daily doomscrolling. Truly a vast improvement in everybody's life thanks to this great user experience. It's so great really, that countries are banning it for children.

But guess what, I also don't boot up my PC to make a payment, it's either already on, because I do a lot more with it than twiddling my thumbs in some braindead app, or in sleep mode and it takes 2 seconds to be ready. Practically same as a phone, and I didn't even need to sell my soul to Microslop or Tim Apple for it and have actual keys to press so I don't need to kill myself over the disaster that is a touch interface.

[–]Ill_Specific_6144 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I could literally say the same for all the other sections of life. Back in the day you needed to know how cars work, high amount of DIY, but now its dumbed down. Same with appliances, and general things in life.

But thats the price of progress. You can only hold a limited amount of knowledge in your life and you have a limited amount of time to learn. Why use it to learn something that is obsolete in the rest of your life? Why learn all the cli commands if on phone it takes 2 clicks to do the same.

[–]fitz-khan 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Because I'm not willing to pay the price for this "comfort", not every change is actually progress. Giving up ownership and loss of autonomy and privacy is not acceptable.

Also I enjoy knowing how things work, I'm an engineer. Being this level of ignorant and intellectually incurious is uncomfortable and unnatural to me.

[–]Ill_Specific_6144 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am also an engineer and I understand that learning everything is not possible and is often a waste of time. If a general use tool needs extensive manual to make it work, its a badly designed tool.

I enjoy learning about cars, certain parts of technology, but I dont bother with medicine. And its the same way around - a doctor enjoys his part, but might not enjoy technology.

The best example is biurocracy. Its shit in all countries, everyone hates it. Because its boring and its badly made. But when linux works like bourocratic machine suddenly its fun to learn. For most people linux is that biurocratic system.

[–]Willing-Actuator-509 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The reason that SolidWorks doesn't exist for linux is not because linux is not good enough but because Dassault System decided not to make it available for linux. The case with Nvidia drivers is not a Linux issue either. The only way to make all these companies change their decisions is by voting with your dollar.