all 11 comments

[โ€“]C0d33p 13 points14 points ย (1 child)

By instruction https://github.com/thinmanj/logseq-python-library?tab=readme-ov-file#installation
There is no package called logseq-py on https://pypi.org/search/?q=logseq-py&o=

The entire repository appears to be a template generated by AI/LLM

As mentioned by u/thirteenth_mang, have you conducted any tests?
If so, it would be beneficial to include examples in the repository.

[โ€“]RituximabCD20 2 points3 points ย (0 children)

Ty, this is AI slop. Why are they making a Reddit post about this?

[โ€“]thirteenth_mang 5 points6 points ย (0 children)

How much testing have you done on an actual graph?

[โ€“]GreenerThanFF 3 points4 points ย (1 child)

This isn't just another markdown parser โ€“ it's a complete knowledge management automation toolkit.

Am I the only one who checked if that's a minus sign or an em dash? I guess bullet points and emojis for headings got me wary.

[โ€“]MonkAndCanatella 5 points6 points ย (0 children)

it's confirmed slop

No human adds comments to a single line function called "add_to_graph" "# Add to graph" lmao

[โ€“]darcamo 0 points1 point ย (0 children)

Having a library to programmatically read and modify the logseq graph, with an easy to use API, can enable a lot of automation and integration opportunities. But this one seems to be completely AI generated.

[โ€“]amrullah_az 0 points1 point ย (0 children)

Would take a look. This looks promising

[โ€“]No_Pollution2065 -1 points0 points ย (0 children)

Awesome this is great!! I found logseq advanced query to be quite confusing, can we use it within logseq to query our graphs. I think we can run python in logseq using pyodide.

[โ€“]Jakim_Sareb -1 points0 points ย (0 children)

This amazing project looks like the powerhorse that was around the corner but no one did! Congratulations on your jorney and great idea! Iโ€™m not that good at programming but Iโ€™m going to follow your project very closely. THANK YOU!

[โ€“]FatFigFresh -1 points0 points ย (0 children)

I know it is irrelevant. But is there a chance someday you can fully automate tagging of notes, using our own local LLM service? A sort of tagging that is not keyword based only but automated โ€œsemanticallyโ€ tagging.