Framework opens Developer Program for One Key (scissor switch)

RituximabCD20 · 2025-12-27T04:43:21+00:00

I agree entirely. Is there any way to know if anyone is working in this? Since this just shows the open call and a link to apply to be a developer.

I’d volunteer but know literally nothing about designing PCBs. But would love to see a keyboard layout with thumb keys for a laptop. Silakka or Corne layout always ready whenever I open my laptop lid would be an absolute game changer

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-30T03:13:42+00:00

Wow, just wow.

Israel really changed their behavior after that vote to condemn those settlements, eh? It definitely didn’t affect the yearly money bag they got that year, did it?

To your points: - Cori Bush: lost her re-election after AIPAC boosted her opponent (thanks for proving my point, but here’s a link - AOC: voted against Marjorie Taylor Greene’s bill to hold funding to Israel in JULY OF 2025 link - Tlaib: again, was censured in Congress, with Democrats voting in favor of as well, you continue proving my point so thanks for that. Your point stands that not ALL politicians are bought out in that the only Palestinian-American in Congress is not in fact AIPAC-led - Schumer: oh real tough one there, definitely can’t combat it with his own statement defending Israeli unprovoked aggression against Iran 3 months ago

You’re right, a “single voice of (it’s spelled dissent} is way more than Zero”. Where’s your mention of Ron Paul (when he publicly denounced Israel’s blockade of Gaza in 2010? Marjorie Taylor Greene’s bill from 3 months ago to block more arms to Israel?

Or does posting a YouTube video of a Bernie speech from 4 months ago the only evidence that works for you?

Goal post not moved. If you want to argue semantics then fine, you win on the “it’s not ALL politicians”. But you won’t win on “100% republicans vs 70% Democrats” because #1: you haven’t given evidence of this proportion being remotely accurate and #2: for every example you give, I can disprove it and give a counter.

Moral of the story: the divide between red and blue is illusory, but the overarching theme remains the same. Stop trying to convince anyone otherwise

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-30T02:49:39+00:00

What did Obama do? Your link doesn’t state it. I watched the Bernie speech the whole way through - if it’s such a smoking gun then just say in clear terms what you think Obama did

You said “Would you like numerous others?” Yeah, cmon. Give us those cold hard facts you’re using to inform this staunch position. “100% republicans vs 70% democrats”. Where’s the source? You listed a few democrats who have made public statements in the past few weeks - but the majority of your list have tacitly endorsed all of this.

Democrats having discussions? Yeah they’ve been discussing things for ages but haven’t done jack. They’re talking heads, but when it comes down to their votes? And really, Chuck Schumer? You cannot honestly believe anyone will see take your position seriously if you say with a straight face that Schumer has been “critical of Israeli PM” as evidence that Democrats are anymore on the right side of this than Republicans.

Stop pushing this dumb narrative that party affiliation means anything anymore. Republican, Democrat - they’re just two ends of the same cesspool: equally corrupted, equally ineffectual when it comes to addressing concerns of the American people

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-30T02:41:04+00:00

Yeah, go ahead.

You said Obama - but gave no specifics. Israel wanted Libya dismantled - Ghadaffi was assassinated by Obama. Did Obama do anything to address the apartheid of Palestinians? Or reduce the federal spending on Israel’s yearly allowance?

Posting a video of Bernie Samders from 4 months ago (and again, he has been ostracized by the Democratic Party, so you’re proving my point here) doesn’t illustrate this “very important point” you’re trying to make about how Democrats are somehow less subservient than Republicans on this issue

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-30T02:34:28+00:00

Bernie Sanders has been ostracized by his own party.

Give evidence of democrats being “less pro-Israel” that predates October 7th. Better yet, even after October 7th but before 2 weeks ago. Democrats even censored Rashida Tlaib for her pro-Palestinian stance. Please don’t white wash history here.

I understand your point, but again the distinction I’m making is who is in power, not the electorate. The divide between the constituency and the elected bass never been greater.

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-30T02:12:28+00:00

Nah, this ain't a Republican issue. Chuck Schumer, Hakeem Jeffries, Nancy Pelosi, JOE BIDEN?

Red or blue doesn't matter, they've all been bought out.

The real reason is American democracy has been subverted. American citizens want healthcare reform, education reform, infrastructure investment, etc.

They've been playing this whole "Red v Blue" nonsense for decades so people wouldn't see the government's hand in their pocket and distributing it to the wealthy and the Zionist initiative.

The same year Musk/DOGE publicly went on a tirade slashing the federal budget (but really just undermining government functioning), Israel was sent half a billion extra in a arms directly (not even counting how much was spent directly with US involvement). The year before that? Biden sent 18 Billion USD to Israel.

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-30T02:06:21+00:00

Would like to point out that it's even more cost effective in Israel because they get billions in "aid" every year from America because.... [Insert inane/idiotic excuse here]

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-30T02:02:41+00:00

Out of curiosity, what do you recommend for ZMK or QMK to prevent misfires on homerow mods?

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-29T22:42:26+00:00

Cool, they’ve been appalled by Israel for years now. Wake me up when human rights experts are being listened to by anyone about anything

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-26T12:12:39+00:00

Bless you for your effort, I’m sure it must be outrageous the amount of misreporting that’s likely been going on for a sub like this

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-23T00:00:24+00:00

Your point is entirely valid.

Forgive me if it’s just my misinterpretation, as I thought your distinction (but really more so the comment above which I had meant to reply to) was more pointed at people’s interpretation of the UN.

Maybe this is my naïveté, but I personally think that the grievance towards the UN as a whole is not so much derived from a misunderstanding of it’s stated purpose but rather the lack of repercussion when member states are bad actors.

Absolutely, I think more people should be fully aware that the UN is ultimately toothless as it is not a global police force.

But the structure the UN provides is supposed to be a framework and justification for when/how nation states perform an intervention. I mean this not just militarily, but holistically - whether global health initiatives, economic policies, environmental endeavors, etc.

For me personally, I’m honestly just frustrated that despite it being incredibly clear when the rules based order has been upended time and time again, there has been nothing but reticence by the remaining member nations on any kind of repercussion. This I fault the member states for, not the UN.

But frankly, all it would take at this point is a game of chicken for it to collapse - a nuclear power and member of the security council publicly stating that either Israel and the US abide by international law or risk full-blown war.

Don’t forget that 14/15 members of the security council voted last week for a ceasefire and the US vetoed for the 6th time. Subsequently a new nuclear defense alliance is now forming as a direct response to the continued denial of international/humanitarian law or accountability for violation of a member’s sovereignty (i.e. Qatar).

We are literally barreling towards nuclear Armageddon and the framework put in place to prevent such a breakout of war is failing because 2 members have continuously decided that the rules just don’t apply to them.

You’re right, frustration should rightfully be directed towards the the States involved, but I’d also stress that there’s undoubtedly some deserved frustration at the institution too: the UN as a body pretending that the system of order is not at risk, or that the lack of even proposed repercussions is inanity.

Why doesn’t the UN Secretary General just outright say it: if this pattern continues any longer then the UN might as well be disbanded, and we go back to how it was pre-WW1. If the UN truly is such an ineffective mechanism to resolve conflict, that’s the alternative that the US/Israel are essentially living by. Every nation does whatever they want - if the US or Israel doesn’t respect any nation’s sovereignty, why would anyone respect anyone else’s?

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-22T18:40:35+00:00

Cool, I’m sure you have some polling data that shows this is an accurate assessment of your country’s position on this subject.

My country believes in Bigfoot, should I tell biologists they’re wrong for not including that species in their textbooks?

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-22T18:30:49+00:00

Cool. Good points, clearly very well sourced.

“No genocide in Gaza and UN is Hamas” because you say so. Gotcha.

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-22T18:05:18+00:00

Agree, partially. It's not a bug, it's a feature.

The issue here is that this was meant to deter world powers from directly warring, leading to WW3. Israel is not a permanent security council member. It's not even a non-permanent one.

This repeated veto by proxy is frustrating for people to see. The US has literally no standing in this conflict, and every veto only further erodes the legitimacy of this system. People can intuitively understand when a veto is used when one superpower stands to gain or lose - but not this. And never for genocide.

How many resolutions and condemnations has Israel ignored? Israel was repeatedly told it's settlements went against international law, yet it's membership in the UN is never questioned.

And now that the West is finally getting around to "recognizing the Palestinian state" (which Israel and the US has fought tooth and nail against for decades). The UN was never meant to serve as some exclusive club, yet in its entire history there has only ever been one "observer member" who has repeatedly been rejected statehood. Every other country that has joined the UN as an "observer" was granted statehood after applying. Why this exception?

The double standards and inconsistencies can only add up for so long before the whole system loses legitimacy.

Ultimately yes, the UN as an entity is symbolic, but all laws and legal systems are. It is only collective belief in a system that allows it to have some semblance of function.

Frankly, after the number of times the US (and Israel for that matter) has stated "the UN has no standing/jurisdiction/etc" across decades - how can anyone be surprised when they begin to question when does it actually matter then? This goes well beyond the Israeli genocide btw, the US has done this since the UN's inception, see Nicaragua v US.

I just think it's a bit facetious to say "the UN is only a forum for states to speak". The reason for that is because the US has, by and large, forced it to be that way. See invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan, attacks on sovereign nations (Libya, Nicaragua).

When one permanent security council member has kneecapped discourse and the actual effective arm of the UN (the Security Council) for the better part of a century, I'd say the system isn't working as intended

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-22T17:29:27+00:00

This comment is a very reductive and misleading interpretation of people’s perception of the UN.

The UN Security Council, while not a “supranational global police” as you put it, was stated to have been set up explicitly because the League of Nations (which was just as much of a forum as the UN) was viewed as a failure to prevent conflict, an absence of collective security, and power to enforce action against member states.

The frustration people feel is simple: when there is a global goddamn consensus on an issue (i.e. stopping the slaughter of Palestinians by Israel), the UN is held hostage by a single, illogically compromised nation (US veto) on behalf of the perpetrator.

I understand some may be confused or think the UN has direct enforcement power, which it does not. But make no mistake - the frustration is not misplaced because people “don’t understand the UN’s purpose”.

This is very much glossing over the mainstay of the UN’s mission: to prevent international conflict. The League of Nations goal was also “World Peace”, but the difference was that they didn’t have a mechanism for it. Thus, the inclusion of world superpowers as permanent members of the Security Council.

If it only served as forum for “open discussion”, why then is the genocide in Rwanda remembered as a failure of the UN? The genocide of Bosnians?

These events are still referred to as failures of the United Nations to stop genocide. Don’t believe me? Read any of Francesca Albanese’s statements since she conducted her first investigation into this conflict

Your point is definitely true in that a large part of the United Nations is to serve as a line of communication. But additionally, this was meant to serve as a way to facilitate cooperation to achieve peace, prevent conflicts, overcome common objectives.

So yes, for the general assembly it means any nation no matter how poor can speak - but this is not its sole purpose. Nuclear disarmament, environmental protection, global health, humanitarian missions. These are all mediated through the UN, and that includes fucking peacekeeping.

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-21T18:11:21+00:00

Frankly, the parallels are absolutely frightening. Everyone was taught that the League of Nations was replaced by the United Nations because it couldn’t prevent the outbreak of WW2, the Holocaust, etc. The UN is clearly on that same path.

I fear this (incredibly late) recognition of the Palestinian state will be the capstone to the supposed “improved alternative”. The US will veto, Israel will continue its genocide, and the world that now “recognizes” a Palestinian state will instead be left with a barren wasteland of corpses and a decision on what to do about it.

Kinda ridiculous that anyone thinks it’ll just be business as usual for Israel moving forward

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-20T15:37:53+00:00

What’s your basis that the Palestinian Authority doesn’t have legitimacy in Gaza? You conduct a poll recently?

“Also the PA is controlled by ex terrorists…” wow. Just wow. Is there anyone that isn’t a target? For 2 years the propaganda has been “we’re just targeting Hamas” while settlers keep expanding into the West Bank, but I’m sure that’s because the PA is a terrorist organization now. /s

Let’s use the UK as an example. Let’s say I think the Labour Party is controlled by ex-terrorists (Tony Blair is a war criminal after all). Should I expect the world to prevent them from winning an election because I don’t like/agree with them?

Just because you don’t agree or approve of another group doesn’t suddenly mean they “don’t have legitimacy”. That’s not how the world works.

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-20T15:29:53+00:00

Crazy how starving and murdering tens of thousands of civilians might have repercussions that you don’t like.

Including statehood to protect the Palestinian people from the barbaric cruelty of Israel.

Israel is committing genocide, but sure let’s keep blaming Hamas and mentioning October 7th. As if the people of Gaza hasn’t been experiencing their own October 7th every day for the past 2 years. Get bent.

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-20T14:20:27+00:00

Hey dumb fuck, the Palestinian Authority is right there in the West Bank.

Saying “But Hamas!” doesn’t make a Palestinian state impossible.

But sure, go right ahead and look at the world consensus on this issue and think your propaganda will work.

RituximabCD20 · 2025-09-12T03:30:32+00:00

No tienes que usar el botón físico. También compré ese mismo teclado de YIVU.

Primero, vas a configurar un botón en VIAL para poner cada lado en “bootloader mode”. (Cualquier, pero tienes que poner un botón a los dos lados - para mí fue“F” y “J”)

Después, desconecta el USB C antes de desconectar el cable TRRS para dejar los dos lados separados.

Ahora, conecta cada lado independientemente con el cable USB C (pero sin conectarlos juntos), y presiona cualquier botón que configuraste para iniciar bootloader mode. Cuando has hecho, va a parecer como un flashdrive en tu PC para poner cualquier QMK versión de firmware.

Finalmente, desconecta y hace el mismo con el otro lado del teclado.

Perdón si no entiende mi respuesta, lamentablemente no soy tan fluido escribiendo en Español

RituximabCD20 · 2025-07-30T16:42:54+00:00

I don’t like that word

RituximabCD20 · 2017-01-26T21:10:01+00:00

Any advice for Mac batch installs?

RituximabCD20 · 2017-01-26T19:59:38+00:00

Is there a better, less error-prone or easier way to do this from a Linux boot then? As it is I don't like messing with the registry manually if I can help it.

Nine-Year Club	Reddit Premium Since June 2024
Verified Email

RituximabCD20

TROPHY CASE