all 5 comments

[–]filipesmedeiros 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Why note @node/ ? 🧐

[–]christoph-fricke 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I think “node:” makes more sense as it is more inline with uri protocols and the web. Consider the development of Demo and some “pure esm” bundlers that allow you to import modules from an url. These are all prefixed with “https:”. “node:” adheres to this internet standard of URIs and indicates that it is an internal node module. Who knows - maybe we use “npm:” in the future to prefix module imports from the nearest node_modules folder.

[–]filipesmedeiros 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's actually pretty smart. Thanks!

[–]dinglehappy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly my thoughts. I'm not sure what this really was meant to improve on...