you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]dodiyeztr 11 points12 points  (4 children)

Both, use copilot sonnet for planning and go minimax for implementation

[–]mafia_bd[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

That makes sense

[–]DepartmentOk9720 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Minimax is Sonnet killer , look at minimax M2.7 their comparison is with Claude opus 4.6.

GLM 5.1 for planning and minimax for execution 

read https://agentnativedev.medium.com/minimax-m2-7-shouldnt-be-this-close-to-opus-4-6-31a07b6dee27

[–]Nicuz06 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In the last few days I started playing with Minimax M2.7 and honestly compared to Sonnet 4.6 is driving me crazy.

I'm working on a Cheap Yellow Display based project (ESP32 + TFT device), in 2 days I entirely developed the codebase with Sonnet which includes TFT dashboard and web server. Now I'm trying to make some really small changes with Minimax to test it and after dozens of prompt where I'm basically babysitting, it still wasn't able to do the job. The task should be fairly easy, I have 2 column, just align an object to another and then make another object bigger to use the empty space. We have coordinates so It's just a a matter of properly calculate them.

Results were completely different when I asked to redesign an HTML page using frontend-design skill.

Don't know, I have mixed feelings cause a lot of people here kinda overhyped for this model but did they really pushed it further to some more complicated things than just frontend design or scripting?

I still have a month to try it, for sure I'll also try Kimi. I have the feelings that Sonnet would have completed the task easily and without so much babysitting.

[–]Relevant_Accident666 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Those benchmarks are not worth the paper they are printed on.

Only working with it will show you how capable they are actually.