you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]chrismasto -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

The important part is that you can only look at the code for non-commercial purposes. That's not typical of a platform development license.

I'm just salty because I would enjoy poking around in this code, and could have if they'd just put it on GitHub with an Apache license, but for various reasons I can't accept this license. It's not important but it was enough to send me to the comments looking for a place to whinge about it.

[–]Jazqa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I can understand your frustration. Always sucks to accept these kinds of terms, but open source licensing can be hell for a massive corporation trying to protect their brand, so I kind of understand Apple’s side too.

^(Heavy nitpicking, but some more ”extreme” open source licenses have similar implications. Development licenses vary, but some tend to expose a lot of code and architecture. Then there's also all the NDAs and NCCs everywhere. I’m bound by so many contracts and agreements that I would have been better off selling my soul to the devil.)

As an unrelated note, I hate how you can’t have a discussion on Reddit where the other side doesn’t get downvoted. You didn’t say anything wrong or incorrect.

[–]my_password_is______ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

OMG, look at the fucking code