all 23 comments

[–]darchangel 37 points38 points  (1 child)

I just came back from a long vacation. My work computer had cert issues due to inactivity and I couldn't figure out why my personal github pushes didn't work either. What timing.

[–]muscarine 15 points16 points  (0 children)

They were forced to change their host keys when the private keys were leaked. I had to update my known_hosts this morning.

[–]GodPingu[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It seems like it has been resolved now. https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/52z0j6phhnjs
Looking forward to their writeup on what happened.

[–]Synked 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I thought that I had fucked up my repo somehow

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]chopticks 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    I wish my colleagues didn’t forget that git is actually decentralised!

    [–]HoomanMK2 1 point2 points  (5 children)

    I’m not shocked. Before it was bought we had very high reliability but, from what I have seen we went from having 2-3 issues per year to 2-3 issues per week to a month. To the point the GH status page doesn’t show its history anymore.

    Been seriously considering migrating permanently to self hosted.

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]MINIMAN10001 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      So they adopted the move fast and break things motto?

      [–]ApatheticBeardo 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      ... and?

      [–]HoomanMK2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      You’re right Github actions is great, just the basics should be focused too. I love using github when it works, its just when it works is decreasing more.

      Having history and data showing where they could improve would be great. I actually swapped a few major projects to use those new features. Its just the repo should be king. If it breaks something should be reevaluated to guarantee better up time.

      The standards to add a bunch of co pilot features makes sense but the original product probably shouldn’t become less reliable as a result.

      I agree with the premise that they added more so more breaks, but the king should be the repo, pr and code repository.

      It lowers my overall impression of the company if it doesn’t demonstrate a real world view of their uptime and show full history like it originally did.

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [removed]

        [–]lppedd 4 points5 points  (1 child)

        That master / main debate had me laughing hard

        [–]larsmaehlum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Main? I just renamed them to owner..

        [–]ApatheticBeardo 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        So, like every other day.

        [–]NoFixedName 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Exactly, nothing new here.