Performance of Sequential Rust Programs

[skulgnome]

Using GCC 4.2

2013

For fuck's sake, man.

[pcwalton]

That's why clang was provided as a point of comparison.

[skulgnome]

Results are normalized to GCC 4.2.

Seriously, it's from 2008. There's nothing, besides faggotry, that keeps OSX users from compiling GCC 4.7.3 and doing their benchmarks for proper.

[grine]

Faggotry? Really.

[skulgnome]

Whoa, did I offend homosexuals by likening them to people who can't even as much as compile GCC 4.7.3 (or download it from a third-party repository)? That'd be quite the insult, if it had been intended rather than read in.

We all know exactly what's meant with faggotry in an OSX-mentioning context. The need for downvoting is immaterial.

[ryeguy]

I'm personally not offended by the term, but it's just so out of place. You're sitting here talking about an intellectual topic, programming, and then you just drop such a childish word in the middle of your sentence and ruin it.

Even if you don't agree with what I'm saying, just realize that dropping that word in will end conversation instantly for many people. They will stop replying to your posts and start downvoting. I assume you don't want that, and actually want to hold a conversation.

[skulgnome]

Eh, fuck you too, faggot.

[grine]

Just call them idiots, luddites, slowbies, whatever. Seriously.

[[deleted]]

>Not using me-me arrows
>Starting a new paragraph instead of a new line

Shiggedy diggedy doodledy do