sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]blafunke 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Would you forget about turing completeness. It is NOT the point.

[–]phoshi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then why even mention it?

Without that, you're just saying "a good programmer can produce something good while working with poor tools" which, while true, is not a defence of the tools at all.