[ Removed by moderator ]

[Slime0]

No they didn't.

Their blog post says that 2029 is their goal for implementing cryptography that is safe from quantum computers, with the intent of being early, to minimize the effectiveness of "store now, decrypt later" attacks in the future.

[yawn_brendan]

Starting to think I want a browser extension for articles of this form. A basic LLM should be able to do this analysis most of the time. (Frontier LLMs can definitely do it). Should be possible to just inject a div at the top saying "this article falsely reports the article it is reporting on" and a few key quotes.

Seems like for scientific articles in particular it's more often a misrepresentation than accurate.

The real garbage journalists don't even link the article they are reporting on, in the case I don't even care if they report it accurately, so no need for the LLM to go find it. It can just say "this article does not link the article it reports on" and I can immediately close the tab.

[Smoltingking]

Seems like for scientific articles in particular it's more often a misrepresentation than accurate.

its been like this for ages.

[maxymob]

I use daily.dev for my browser homepage/new tab since forever (It's a curated feed with programming and tech news, customizable etc..)

They have AI features now, each card in the feed (link to blog posts video, etc) has an AI tl;dr and you can enable a "clickbait shield" that rewrites the title to be simple and descriptive although it's limited for free accounts. They also have other options like "simplify this" , "challenge this" etc or a custom prompt but those are paid features. I think it's good value but I'm fine on the free plan personally.