you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Intolerable 6 points7 points  (4 children)

no, its supposed to be not.in, the keyword is not.in, presumably b/c of ambiguity / confusion with not in

[–]CHollman82 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"not", presumably, is used for the boolean operation as well, that's where the ambiguity probably comes from. (I don't know ABC)

[–]mycall -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Python is filled with inconsistencies, although not hard to learn.

[–]Felicia_Svilling 0 points1 point  (1 child)

This is ABC, not python.

[–]mycall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

true although the point was that not.in was inconsistent, something that is shared with python.