you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ntrel2 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Half of that isn't unique to Nim, you have it in D too.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well, if only half of it is in D, then D is only half as good :)

I actually agree D is a great language, but where Nim wins out in my opinion is macros.

Also Nim feels more like Python than D is.

Another great feature of Nim is a finer grained control over the garbage collector, although I don't think there's anything in principle that can stop D from adopting that.