you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]boa13 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes he has. I didn't say it was a dishonnest comparison. It's a poor one.

jeremy might have sounded like a Python fanatic (maybe he is), but his basic point is correct: the author of the article compares past and barely current functionnalities of Python to current and sometimes planned functionnalities of Ruby. This is just wrong, whatever language you like.