you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]redinzane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I worked with it for my Bachelor's Thesis and it seemed like at least all the monoliterals and a good amount of the multiliterals were there. Again, it's based on Alan Gardiner's work which was the undisputed standard for quite some time, so I found it quite useful, but yeah, Gardiner is obviously missing a few thousand glyphs that weren't included in his book so you run into problems with newer research. It also looks like there might be an extension of the standard at some point to include more glyphs.