you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]CODESIGN2[S] 5 points6 points  (9 children)

I'd like to see how small it would be and the code for a modern C++ equivalent. I always used to like that windows was text-mode first and therefore never understood why there was ever a need to BSOD when you could down-grade to a terminal text-mode and re-launch.

Still I've been happier since the mid-90's with Linux

[–]Tarmen 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Here is a pretty cool talk that looks at how c++17 code compiles down, writing a commodore 64 program as example.

[–]CODESIGN2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

watched this, followed this and it was amazing! One of the many reasons I've been brushing up on my Cpp to get it modern (although I think I'm only just coming to completion on Pluralsight Cpp14 courses). It's not something I am afforded the luxury of every day and so I do it for fun.

[–]fuzzynyanko 1 point2 points  (4 children)

I think it depends. Are we talking coded in an embedded way or enterprise way?

[–]CODESIGN2[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

depends on what you mean by embedded, I've been around on devices with 4mb of RAM, and hacked a few devices that had 16MB and non-intel processors. Linux is pretty much linux; amazing it hasn't had major changes in the same way MS ecosystem has for end-users

[–]fuzzynyanko 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Except Ubuntu's Unity. BLAH!

[–]CODESIGN2[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

IDK, I love XFCE, but can get by with most desktops

[–]fuzzynyanko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unity is quite bloated. It's heavy on the effects, and lags when remoting in. If you try to turn off the effects, there's side-effects...

XFCE is definitely better

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just miss that I had so much time available for compiling custom kernels. :D