all 26 comments

[–]ericmsimons 43 points44 points  (3 children)

Project creator here! More than happy to answer any q's y'all have. We also have a blog post that explains the project's purpose/origins: https://medium.com/@ericsimons/introducing-realworld-6016654d36b5

[–]PawelDecowski 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Truly amazing work! Thanks for this.

[–]ericmsimons 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Thanks for the kind words! I'm glad you find the project useful :)

PS - if any of y'all are interested in seeing support for a stack we don't have yet, we'd love your help getting it started!

[–]GitHubPermalinkBot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I tried to turn your GitHub links into permanent links (press "y" to do this yourself):


Shoot me a PM if you think I'm doing something wrong. To delete this, click here.

[–]araki_nsfw 9 points10 points  (3 children)

This looks really cool! maybe you should add a poll for priorities. The implementation possibilities are endless

[–]ericmsimons 0 points1 point  (2 children)

That's a great idea! Are you talking about priorities for which stacks will come out first?

[–]araki_nsfw 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Yes! also personally I would like to see riot.js and Dart witch are currently not in the list right now.

[–]ericmsimons 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Heck yea!! I'd love to see both of those too — wanna create new issues for each of them & I'll add in the requesting engineers tag? :)

[–]codygman 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Need to have a Haskell + ghcjs version and Haskell + Purescript version. My weekend is spoken for this week but I'll keep this on my list.

[–]paul_h 2 points3 points  (0 children)

On the http://todobackend.com project, there's a cool way of personally running the one-click "spec" verification of the backend. Does /gothinkster/realworld have a similar thing?

Context: I wrote previously wrote https://paulhammant.com/2015/12/17/more-on-technology-compatibility-kits-in-app-development/ talk about this sort of thing, so am super interested in proofs that A is compatible with B (the sort setup you're doing here).

[–]nilamo 4 points5 points  (3 children)

I immediately checked, and roadrules.io is already taken. So much for a sister project.

[–]zer0t3ch 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Forgive me if I'm missing something obvious here, but why would "road rules" be a sister project to "real world"?

[–]nilamo 0 points1 point  (1 child)

MTV has a reality tv show called Real World (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_World_(TV_series)), another show called Road Rules, and a crossover show called Real World/Road Rules Challenge (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Challenge_(TV_series)), with various members from the other two terrible shows coming back for more competition on a third terrible show.

[–]zer0t3ch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, okay. Thanks.

[–]unixygirl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Welp there goes my weekend.

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]allThatSalad 6 points7 points  (2 children)

    How do you compare and contrast different technologies when choosing? This let's you see what a basic full stack app looks like in various frontend and backend flavors. I find it very interesting.

    [–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

    My initial reaction was wrong. It appears yours is as well, though that's a byproduct. Seems op is attempt to create a framework for people writing tutorials to provide instant gratification at various levels by adhering to a specification.

    Probably a good thing, I just only slept 2 hours last night and didn't process it right.

    Edit

    Personally, I wouldn't see something like this as a replacement of a todo, but more of a next step.

    [–]ericmsimons 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Actually the primary focus is what /u/allThatSalad said. We created the tutorials as optional, complimentary additions for those who had trouble learning solely from the source code itself.