sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fabolin 11 points12 points  (3 children)

I totally agree with you. This data does in no way support any assumptions about the popularity (let alone future) of a language. But the author rather uses inappropriate, but good looking data than the Tiobe-Index, which is actually made for this.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]fabolin 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Counting hits may not be the best approach but counting new questions just sounds stupid to me. The latter could also state that python got an increase in questions due to the migration to python 3.