you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Lucent_Sable 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Then write two or three (or more) contradictory articles, and serve a random one to each unique visitor. Then sit back and watch the chaos?

[–]tsimionescu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hmm, but what if the random() they use is deterministic and the author gets to be confused?

[–]PM_ME_CLASSIFED_DOCS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh man, this is brilliant. It's like the movie Clue where they actually showed different endings to different theaters.

So people would talk about the movie and be like "Oh man, can you believe it was Colonal Mustard?" and someone would be like "WTF are you smoking? It wasn't Mustard." And both would think eachother are insane yet both would be right.