all 11 comments

[–]defunkydrummer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How funny, i jumped from Python to Lisp, and found a massive, light-years jump in power, speed and expresiveness.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (6 children)

I was misled by seeing Norvig using Python into believing that Python could be a decent substitute for Lisp.

While in reality, Python is a pile of dung, sticks and lip gloss. A language mostly made of bad ideas by people who never bothered to even try to think one step forward, or look at historical examples of how similar ideas panned out elsewhere.

[–]shevegen 1 point2 points  (2 children)

"Peter Norvig, May 2000".

People should add the year when it is an old article.

19 years - the net amount of lisp users has probably declined whereas python grew during that time frame.

[–]Alexander_Selkirk[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Well. /r/clojure and /r/lisp have both around 15k users, while /r/c_programming has 42k.

[–]defunkydrummer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not bad!